Erroneous interpretations which may result from application of the "myofibrillar ATPase" histochemical procedure to developing muscle.
Erroneous interpretations which may result from application of the "myofibrillar ATPase" histochemical procedure to developing muscle.
复制标题
将“肌原纤维 ATP 酶”组织化学程序应用于发育中的肌肉可能会导致错误的解释。
DOI:
10.1016/0014-4886(72)90042-8
复制
发表时间:
1972
影响因子:
5.3
通讯作者:
F. Samaha
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
L. Guth;F. Samaha
In muscles of adult mammals, actomyosin ATPase (AM-ATPase) activity, estimated either biochemically or by histochemistry, is proportional to the speed of contraction, slow muscles having low enzymatic activity and fast muscles having high activity. However, the muscles of newborn mammals are slowly contracting, yet they strain intensely by the histochemical procedure currently used to demonstrate AM-ATPase activity. Biochemical and histochemical methods have been applied to newborn and to slow and fast adult rabbit muscle to ascertain whether the intense histochemical reactivity of newborn muscle fibers is actually due to a quantitatively high AM-ATPase activity. While the majority of fibers of 1, 5 and 10-day-old rabbits stained as intensely as adult fast muscle fibers, the ATPase activity of actomyosin isolated from the 5 and 10-day-old muscles was in fact very low, being the same as that of adult slow muscle and approximately 25% of that of fast muscle. The intense staining of the neonatal fibers can be explained by the pH stability of their ATPase, the difference in packing of myofibrils and the staining of other ATPases. The AM-ATPase of adult slow muscle is alkali-labile, whereas that of adult fast muscle and of neonatal muscle is alkali-stable. Inasmuch as the histochemical reaction for AM-ATPase requires alkaline conditions (pH 9.4), the neonatal muscle stains with greater intensity than does adult slow muscle even though the specific activity of the two tissues is similar. We conclude that the histochemical method for AM-ATPase does not necessarily reveal the level of enzymatic activity and that erroneous conclusions may result from the quantitative interpretation of histochemical observations.