Between Co-Management and Responsibilisation: Comparative Perspectives from Two Reservas Comunales in the Peruvian Amazon

Between Co-Management and Responsibilisation: Comparative Perspectives from Two Reservas Comunales in the Peruvian Amazon
复制标题

共同管理与责任之间:秘鲁亚马逊地区两个公共保护区的比较视角

DOI:
10.1111/blar.13539
复制
发表时间:
2024
影响因子:
0.9
通讯作者:
Sarmiento Barletti J
Sarmiento Barletti J
中科院分区:
法学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sarmiento Barletti J

文献摘要

相似文献

秘鲁引入了共同管理的reservas Comunales(公共保护区),作为“堡垒保护”方法的替代方案,“堡垒保护”方法是其他保护区的特征,在这些保护区中,土著人民往往被排除在保护制度的物理空间和管理方面。虽然这些保护区在国际上被称赞为支持土著人民的自决,但本文探讨了thecogestión(共同管理)制度对土著组织和社区产生的挑战。本文聚焦于共同管理两个公共保护区时所产生的“责任”关系,反映了这种责任转移的不同轨迹,以及土著共同管理组织期望采用政府保护目标的过程。
Peru introduced co‐managedReservas Comunales(Communal Reserves) as an alternative to the ‘fortress conservation’ approach that characterises other protected areas where Indigenous Peoples tend to be excluded from both the physical space and managerial aspects of conservation regimes. Although these Reserves are lauded internationally as supporting Indigenous Peoples' self‐determination, this article examines the challenges that arise from thecogestión(co‐management) regime for Indigenous organisations and communities. Focusing on the ‘responsibilisation’ relationships created in the co‐management of two Communal Reserves, the article reflects on the different trajectories of this transfer of responsibilities, and the processes through which Indigenous co‐management organisations are expected to adopt the government's conservation goals.