Public-academic partnerships: research in community mental health settings: a practicum experience for researchers.
Public-academic partnerships: research in community mental health settings: a practicum experience for researchers.
复制标题
公共学术伙伴关系：社区心理健康环境研究：研究人员的实践经验。
DOI：
10.1176/ps.2008.59.11.1246
复制
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Velligan,Dawn
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Miller,AlexanderL;Lopez,Linda;Gonzalez,JodiM;Dassori,Albana;Bond,Gary;Velligan,Dawn
公共-学术伙伴关系证明了这些研究，并支持机构参与研究的概念。研究招募人员经常与诊所人员接触，主要涉及在他们去诊所就诊时接触医疗记录和潜在的参与者。调查人员有时会与医务人员会面，描述特定的研究及其纳入和排除标准。因此，工作人员和研究人员之间有许多互动。作为我们IP-RISP的一部分，社区精神卫生中心管理人员、临床工作人员和办事员接受了焦点小组或个别采访，询问他们对总体研究和对其机构患者进行的研究的态度。一个由大学研究助理组成的焦点小组被要求就在机构网站工作的态度和在这些网站的经历发表评论，并与大学调查人员进行了个别访谈。从这些小组和个人采访中得出了几个主题，正在编写一份完整的报告。该机构的工作人员发现了几个问题。例如，他们认为研究人员对他们的工作需求缺乏了解或欣赏，他们认为研究人员对他们与研究有关的请求(如绘制患者病历)何时耗时或具有破坏性的认识微乎其微，他们对研究人员不容易被识别为研究人员并且没有被介绍给他们表示失望。研究人员发现了一些问题，其中包括机构工作人员对研究人员的需求给予较低优先级的主要关切。与这一问题有关的是，机构工作人员普遍认为缺乏对研究的欣赏，对诊所开展的研究项目缺乏认识。令人惊讶的是，在前线诊所和研究人员的层面上，频繁的互动并没有产生对“对方”的角色和功能的理解和欣赏。为了明确医疗服务中心的流程和人员，我们设计并实现了一个研究人员实习。
Public-Academic Partnerships proved these studies and supported the concept of agency involvement with research. Research recruiters had frequent contact with clinic personnel, mostly involving access to medical records and potential participants at the times of their clinic visits. Investigators sometimes met with medical staff to describe particular studies and their inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thus there were many interactions between staff and research personnel. As part of our IP-RISP, community mental health center management, clinical staff, and clerical staff were interviewed in focus groups or individually about their attitudes toward research in general and research being conducted with patients from their agency. A focus group of university-based research assistants was asked to comment on attitudes toward working at agency sites and experiences at these sites, and individual interviews were conducted with university investigators. Several themes emerged from these groups and individual interviews, and a full report is in preparation. Agency personnel identified several problems. For example, they viewed researchers as having little knowledge or appreciation of their work demands, they thought that researchers had minimal awareness of when their research-related requests (such as pulling patients’ charts) were time-consuming or disruptive, and they expressed frustration that research personnel were not readily identifiable as such and were not introduced to them. Research personnel identified problems that included a major concern that agency staff gave researchers’ needs low priority. Related to this problem was a perceived lack of appreciation of research in general and lack of awareness of research projects carried out at the clinic on the part of agency staff. It was striking that at the level of frontline clinic and research staff, frequent interactions had not produced understanding and appreciation of the roles and functions of the “other side.” To clarify Center for Health Care Services’ procedures and personnel, we designed and implemented a practicum for research personnel.