Development of Abbreviated Versions of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure.
Development of Abbreviated Versions of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure.
复制标题
单词听觉识别和回忆测量的缩写版本的开发。
DOI：
10.1097/aud.0000000000000869
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Pichora-Fuller,MKathleen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Smith,SherriL;Ryan,DavidB;Pichora-Fuller,MKathleen
目的：本研究的目的是开发和评估缩写版本的单词听觉识别和回忆措施（WARRM）的一部分，在一个迭代过程中的发展，一个可行的测试，为潜在的未来临床用途。设计：三个原始WARRM（O-WARRM）随机修改通过改变演示范式。与O-WARRM（n= 100个单词）不同，实验WARRM（E-WARRM）范式由2 - 6个集合大小的一个试验组成，以创建一个“运行”（n= 20个单词），每个随机化由5个运行（n= 100个单词）组成，而不是每个集合大小呈现5个试验，其中集合大小从2增加到6。共有24名听力正常的年轻听众和48名听力损失的老年听众（OHL）进行了1次随机化的O-WARRM和1次不同的随机化的E-WARRM。结果：O-WARRM和所有版本的E-WARRM（5个单独的运行和整体）的识别和回忆性能在每个听众组内是相似的，听力正常的年轻听众在所有措施上优于OHL听众。相关性分析显示，OHL听众组的缩写WARRM运行和O-WARRM之间存在中度至强烈的关联。分层回归建模表明，E-WARRM的运行1是O-WARRM性能的良好预测因子，并且添加额外运行不会改善预测。综上所述，这些结果表明，从E-WARRM进行一次运行需要进一步检查以供临床使用。额外的分析显示，从三个E-WARRM随机两个listener group.Conclusions：缩写版本的O-WARRM的开发作为本研究的一部分，在所有五个运行同等分数。这是通过修改原始呈现范例并在原始3次随机化中创建15次独特的“运行”来实现的。由此产生的15次运行可以被认为是15个独特的缩写WARRM列表，在未来进行进一步研究以确定重要特性后，这些列表有可能用于临床。缩写WARRM列表可能有助于在听力康复过程中量化听力损失听者的听觉工作记忆。
Objectives:The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate abbreviated versions of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure (WARRM) as part of an iterative process in the development of a feasible test for potential future clinical use.Design:The three original WARRM (O-WARRM) randomizations were modified by altering the presentation paradigm. Instead of presenting 5 trials per set size with set size increasing from 2 to 6 as in the O-WARRM (n= 100 words), the experimental WARRM (E-WARRM) paradigm consisted of one trial from each of set sizes 2 to 6 to create a “run”(n= 20 words) with each randomization consisting of 5 runs (n= 100 words). A total of 24 younger listeners with normal hearing and 48 older listeners with hearing loss (OHL) were administered 1 randomization of the O-WARRM and 1 different randomization of the E-WARRM.Results:The recognition and recall performances on the O-WARRM and all versions of the E-WARRM (five individual runs and overall) were similar within each listener group, with the younger listeners with normal hearing outperforming the OHL listeners on all measures. Correlation analyses revealed moderate to strong associations between the abbreviated WARRM runs and the O-WARRM for the OHL listener group. Hierarchical regression modeling suggested that run 1 of the E-WARRM was a good predictor of O-WARRM performance and that adding additional runs did not improve the prediction. Taken together, these findings suggest that administering one run from the E-WARRM warrants further examination for clinical use. Additional analyses revealed equivalent scores on all five runs from the three E-WARRM randomizations for both listener groups.Conclusions:Abbreviated versions of the O-WARRM were developed as part of this study. This was accomplished by modifying the original presentation paradigm and creating 15 unique “runs” among the original 3 randomizations. The resulting 15 runs could be considered 15 unique and abbreviated WARRM lists that have potential, in the future after further studies are conducted to establish important properties, for clinic use. The abbreviated WARRM lists may be useful for quantifying auditory working memory of listeners with hearing loss during the audiologic rehabilitation process.