Assessing emotional expression: Spanish adaptation of the rationality/emotional defensiveness scale
Assessing emotional expression: Spanish adaptation of the rationality/emotional defensiveness scale
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s0191-8869(96)00250-4
复制
发表时间：
1997-05-01
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Spielberger, CD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
FernandezBallesteros, R;Zamarron, MD;Spielberger, CD
心理测量特性的R/艾德量表进行了调查，在四个样本的西班牙人口：男性（n = 98）和女性（n = 239）的学生，健康女性（n = 96），女性良性乳腺疾病（n = 90），女性乳腺癌（n = 122）。分析显示项目间一致性高（Cronbach α从0.82到0.87），高项目剩余相关性（排名从0.63到0.32），重测信度高（15天，r = 0.81），R/艾德量表与社会期望值无显著相关与Spielberger及其同事的研究结果一致，因子分析揭示了两个因素的稳定性（跨样本），即所谓的“理性”和“情绪防御”。最后，R/艾德（R和艾德分量表）评分以及项目评分在乳腺癌组与其他组之间存在显著差异。这些结果与Spielberger及其同事获得的结果一致，并支持癌症患者具有特定行为模式的假设。(C)1997年爱思唯尔科学有限公司
Psychometric properties of the R/ED Scale were investigated in four samples of Spanish populations: male (n = 98) and female (n = 239) students, healthy women (n = 96), women with benign breast disease (n = 90), and women with breast cancer (n = 122). Analyses reveal high inter-item consistency (Cronbach's alpha from 0.82 to 0.87), high item remainder correlations (ranking from 0.63 to 0.32), high test-retest reliability (15 days, r = 0.81), and no significant correlations between R/ED Scale and Social Desirability (r = -0.17) and faking (r = -0.09) were found. In line with Spielberger and colleagues' results, factorial analysis reveals the stability (across samples) of two factors, so called, 'Rationality' and 'Emotional Defensiveness'. Finally R/ED (R and ED Subscales) scores as well as item scores significantly differ between the breast cancer group and the other groups. These results are congruent with those obtained by Spielberger and associates as well as supporting the hypothesis that cancer patients have a specific behavioral pattern. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.