'Classification' and 'judgement': social class and the 'cognitive structures' of choice of Higher Education
'Classification' and 'judgement': social class and the 'cognitive structures' of choice of Higher Education
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/01425690120102854
复制
发表时间：
2002-03-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Reay, D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ball, SJ;Davies, J;Reay, D
高等教育的社会阶层相关模式问题近年来在英国引起了广泛的讨论，但总体上被片面地描述为选择问题（精英主义），而忽视了选择的社会维度。在这里，借鉴经济和社会研究理事会的研究，他的选择是检查使用布迪厄的“分类”和“判断”的概念。他被认为是在其内部地位的差异。学生的积极和消极的选择，使用定性和定量的数据来解决，和“准确性”的状态感知也进行了测试。有人认为，选择注入阶级和种族的意义，选择决策中起着至关重要的作用，在复制的分工和层次结构，在高等教育，但也选择的想法假设一种形式上的平等，掩盖了“的影响真实的不平等”。高等教育的选择根植于不同类型的传记和制度习惯，以及不同的“机会结构”。
The issue of social-class-related patterns of access to Higher Education (HE) has become a matter of public debate in the UK recently, but is on the whole portrayed one-sidedly in terms of issues of selection (elitism), and the social dimensions of choice are neglected. Here, drawing on an Economic and Social Research Council research study, choice of HE is examined using Bourdieu's concepts of 'classification' and 'judgement'. HE is viewed in terms of its internal status differentiations. Students' positive and negative choices are addressed using qualitative and quantitative data, and the 'accuracy' of status perceptions are also tested. It is argued that choices are infused with class and ethnic meanings and that choice-making plays a crucial role in the reproduction of divisions and hierarchies in HE, but also that the very idea of choice assumes a kind of formal equality that obscures 'the effects of real inequality'. HE choices are embedded in different kinds of biographies and institutional habituses, and different 'opportunity structures'.