Biased and unbiased estimation of the average length of stay in intensive care units in the Covid-19 pandemic.

Biased and unbiased estimation of the average length of stay in intensive care units in the Covid-19 pandemic.
复制标题

对 Covid-19 大流行期间重症监护病房平均住院时间的有偏和无偏估计

DOI:
10.1186/s13613-020-00749-6
复制
发表时间:
2020-10-16
影响因子:
8.1
通讯作者:
Hejblum G
Hejblum G
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lapidus N;Zhou X;Carrat F;Riou B;Zhao Y;Hejblum G

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

重症监护病房(ICU_ALOS)的平均住院时间(LOS)是总结危重床位占有率的有用参数。在新病毒暴发期间,及早估计感染患者的可靠ICU_ALOS估计对于准确地将检查缓解和准备情景的模型参数化是至关重要的。比较了ICU_ALOS的两种估计方法:估计日期已出院患者的平均LOS(DPE),以及用于分析事件发生时间数据的标准参数方法,该方法符合观察数据的给定分布,并包括在估计日期(CPE)仍在ICU接受治疗的患者的经审查的停留时间。方法对一系列新冠肺炎患者(n = ,59例)在专门治疗此类患者的ICU中进行比较。在最后一次随访日期,即首次入院后99天,除一名患者外,所有患者均已出院。一项模拟研究考察了这些方法模式的泛化能力。CPE和DPE估计也与迄今报道的新冠肺炎估计进行了比较。LOS ≥ 30天涉及59名患者中的14名(24%),包括观察到的21例死亡中的8例。首次入院2个月后,38例(%)患者已出院,相应的DPE和CPE估计ICU_ALOS(95%CI)分别为13.0天(10.4~15.6天)和23.1天(18.1~29.7天)。该系列的真实ICU_ALOS超过21天,远高于迄今报道的估计。更有可能在暴发过程中较早地观察到短期停留的排放。谨慎、无偏倚的ICUALOS估计建议将比新冠肺炎预测模型中采用的更高的ICU床位占用负担参数化。国家自然科学基金项目中国(81900097-周博士)和湖北省科技厅应急响应项目(2020FCA023-Pr.赵)。
The average length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU_ALOS) is a helpful parameter summarizing critical bed occupancy. During the outbreak of a novel virus, estimating early a reliable ICU_ALOS estimate of infected patients is critical to accurately parameterize models examining mitigation and preparedness scenarios. Two estimation methods of ICU_ALOS were compared: the average LOS of already discharged patients at the date of estimation (DPE), and a standard parametric method used for analyzing time-to-event data which fits a given distribution to observed data and includes the censored stays of patients still treated in the ICU at the date of estimation (CPE). Methods were compared on a series of all COVID-19 consecutive cases (n = 59) admitted in an ICU devoted to such patients. At the last follow-up date, 99 days after the first admission, all patients but one had been discharged. A simulation study investigated the generalizability of the methods' patterns. CPE and DPE estimates were also compared to COVID-19 estimates reported to date. LOS ≥ 30 days concerned 14 out of the 59 patients (24%), including 8 of the 21 deaths observed. Two months after the first admission, 38 (64%) patients had been discharged, with corresponding DPE and CPE estimates of ICU_ALOS (95% CI) at 13.0 days (10.4–15.6) and 23.1 days (18.1–29.7), respectively. Series' true ICU_ALOS was greater than 21 days, well above reported estimates to date. Discharges of short stays are more likely observed earlier during the course of an outbreak. Cautious unbiased ICU_ALOS estimates suggest parameterizing a higher burden of ICU bed occupancy than that adopted to date in COVID-19 forecasting models. Support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81900097 to Dr. Zhou) and the Emergency Response Project of Hubei Science and Technology Department (2020FCA023 to Pr. Zhao).
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2004064117
发表时间: 2020-04-21
影响因子: 11.1
作者:
Moghadas, Seyed M.;Shoukat, Affan;Galvani, Alison P.
通讯作者: Galvani, Alison P.
DOI: 10.7326/m20-1260
发表时间: 2020-07-07
影响因子: 39.2
作者:
Weissman, Gary E.;Crane-Droesch, Andrew;Halpern, Scott D.
通讯作者: Halpern, Scott D.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003846
发表时间: 2015
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Lipsitch M;Donnelly CA;Fraser C;Blake IM;Cori A;Dorigatti I;Ferguson NM;Garske T;Mills HL;Riley S;Van Kerkhove MD;Hernán MA
通讯作者: Hernán MA
中国武汉市 138 例 2019 新型冠状病毒感染肺炎住院患者的临床特征。
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585
发表时间: 2020-03-17
影响因子: 120.7
作者:
Wang, Dawei;Hu, Bo;Peng, Zhiyong
通讯作者: Peng, Zhiyong
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.5394
发表时间: 2020-04-28
影响因子: 120.7
作者:
Grasselli, Giacomo;Zangrillo, Alberto;Pesenti, Antonio
通讯作者: Pesenti, Antonio