The Power of Imagination: Whose Northeast and Whose Manchuria?
The Power of Imagination: Whose Northeast and Whose Manchuria?
复制标题
想象的力量：谁的东北、谁的满洲？
DOI：
10.1163/146481702793647524
复制
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. Narangoa
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Narangoa
在世纪早期，满洲成为欧文·拉蒂夫所说的“冲突的摇篮”，俄罗斯和日本在东北亚争夺霸权。俄国和日本在蒙古和满洲的介入，特别是在日俄战争之后，迫使中国当局证明东北（东北），即满洲，是中国不可分割的一部分。而日本则持相反的观点，将满洲说成是与中国分离的领土，以证明其在那里的存在是正当的。在本文中，我认为，日本和中国的旅行者的帐户，他们的侦察或回忆录的满洲及其满族和蒙古族居民的著作，是更大的地理和历史结构的权力斗争的一部分，无论是在日本声称满洲和中国的“反应”的损失满洲。
In the early twentieth century, Manchuria became what Owen Lattimore called a ‘Cradle of Conflict’ where Russia and Japan competed for supremacy in Northeast Asia. Russian and Japanese involvement in Mongolia and Manchuria, especially after the Russo-Japanese War, compelled Chinese authorities to certify that the Northeast (Dongbei), that is Manchuria, was an integral part of China. Japan, for its part, asserted the opposite and represented Manchuria as a territory separate from China in order to justify its presence there. In this paper I argue that Japanese and Chinese travellers’ accounts, their reconnaissance or memoir writings on Manchuria and its Manchu and Mongolian inhabitants, were part of larger geographical and historical constructions of power struggle, in terms of both the Japanese claim for Manchuria and the Chinese ‘response’ to the loss of Manchuria.