How to critique qualitative research articles.

How to critique qualitative research articles.
复制标题

如何批评定性研究文章。

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1993
期刊:
The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Jacqueline Roberts
Jacqueline Roberts
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cheryl Forchuk;Jacqueline Roberts

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

对定性研究的批评需要使用与定量研究不同的标准和准则。可用的定性方法的巨大多样性可能使不太熟悉这些方法的研究消费者难以进行评估或批判性评价。本文建议在对质性研究论文进行审查时应遵循以下原则:题目必须适合于质性研究;所选择的具体的质性研究方法必须“适合”;所审查的文献应与所选择的方法一致;应充分描述信息提供者或参与者、背景和研究者;要有正确的信息收集和分析方法,结论要合理,研究要有一定的重要性和针对性。
The critique of qualitative research requires the use of different standards and criteria than are used for quantitative research. The great diversity of available qualitative methods can make evaluation or critical appraisal difficult for consumers of research who are less familiar with these methods. The current paper suggests that the following guidelines be used when a qualitative research paper is being examined: the topic must be appropriate for qualitative enquiry; the specific qualitative research method chosen must "fit"; the literature reviewed should be consistent with the method chosen; there should be ample description of informants or participants, context, and researcher; appropriate methods for information gathering and information analysis should be employed; the conclusions should be sound; and, the research must have some importance and relevance.