The hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and lung cancer risk:: A meta-analysis

The hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and lung cancer risk:: A meta-analysis
复制标题

DOI:
10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-0001
复制
发表时间:
2008-07-01
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Chen, Kexin
Chen, Kexin
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Li, Haixin;Hao, Xishan;Chen, Kexin

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

人类8-氧鸟嘌呤DNA糖基化酶(hOGG1)基因中潜在的功能多态性Ser326Cys与肺癌风险有关,但已发表的研究结果好坏参半。为了总结已发表的数据,我们进行了全面的荟萃分析。两位研究者使用搜索短语“hOGG1/OGG1/OGG和多态性/遗传变异与肺癌”,从PubMed上发表的17例病例对照研究中独立提取数据。荟萃分析包括6375例癌症病例和6406名对照受试者。结果显示,携带hOGG1 Cys/Cys基因型的个体患肺癌的风险没有显著增加[比值比(OR), 1.15;95%(置信区间)CI, 0.94-1.41],与Ser/Ser基因型比较;同样,在隐性模式(OR, 1.09; 95% CI, Cys/Cys与Ser/Cys+Ser/Ser)或显性模式(OR, 1.06; 95% cl, 0.93-1.21, Cys/Cys+Ser/Cys与Ser/Ser)中均未发现与肺癌风险有显著关联。然而,在显性模型中,亚洲受试者的风险显著增加(OR为1.18;Cys/Cys+Ser/Cys与Ser/Ser相比,95% Cl为1.01-1.38)。在对照源的分层分析中,与Ser/Ser基因型相比,基于人群的研究中与hOGG1 Cys/Cys基因型相关的肺癌风险显著增加(OR, 1.32; 93% CI, 1.04-1.67),但在基于医院的研究中没有(OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.98-1.42);然而,在吸烟状况的分层分析中,在优势模型中仅在非吸烟者中观察到风险增加(OR, 1.32; 95% Cl, 1.04-1.67)。荟萃分析表明,在未来包括多种族群体的更大的遗传关联研究中,应考虑仔细匹配。
The potentially functional polymorphism Ser326Cys in the human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (hOGG1) gene has been implicated in lung cancer risk, but published studies have mixed findings. To summarize published data, we did a comprehensive meta-analysis. Two investigators extracted data independently from 17 case control studies published in the PubMed using the search phrases "hOGG1/OGG1/OGG and polymorphism/genetic variation and lung cancer." The meta-analysis included 6,375 cancer cases and 6,406 control subjects. The results showed that individuals carrying the hOGG1 Cys/Cys genotype did not have significantly increased risk of lung cancer [odds ratios (OR), 1.15; 95% (confidence interval) CI, 0.94-1.41] compared with those with the Ser/Ser genotype; similarly, no significant association with lung cancer risk was found either in the recessive (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.90-1.32 for Cys/Cys versus Ser/Cys+Ser/Ser) or dominant model of the Ser326 allele (OR, 1.06; 95% cl, 0.93-1.21 for Cys/Cys+Ser/Cys versus Ser/Ser). However, significantly increased risks were found among Asian subjects (OR, 1.18; 95% Cl, 1.01-1.38 for Cys/Cys+Ser/Cys versus Ser/Ser) in a dominant model. In stratified analyses by control source, compared with the Ser/Ser genotype, lung cancer risk associated with the hOGG1 Cys/Cys genotype was significantly increased in population-based studies (OR, 1.32; 93% CI, 1.04-1.67) but not in hospital-based studies (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.98-1.42); in stratified analyses by the smoking status, however, the increased risk was observed only among nonsmokers in a dominant model (OR, 1.32; 95% Cl, 1.04-1.67). The meta-analysis suggested that a careful matching should be considered in future larger genetic association studies including multiple ethnic groups.