Superiority of 6-[18F]-fluorodopamine positron emission tomography versus [131I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy in the localization of metastatic pheochromocytoma
Superiority of 6-[18F]-fluorodopamine positron emission tomography versus [131I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy in the localization of metastatic pheochromocytoma
复制标题
DOI:
10.1210/jc.2003-030235
复制
发表时间:
2003-09-01
影响因子:
5.8
通讯作者:
Pacak, K
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ilias, I;Yu, J;Pacak, K
The purpose of the study was to assess the diagnostic utility of 6-[F-18]-fluorodopamine ([F-18]-DA) positron emission tomography scanning ( PET) vs. [I-131]-metaiodobenzylguanidine ( MIBG) scintigraphy in patients with metastatic pheochromocytoma (PHEO). We studied 10 men and six women ( mean age 38.2 +/- 11.5 yr) referred to our institution for metastatic PHEO; two patients were studied twice within a 2-yr interval. Imaging modalities included computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), [I-131]-MIBG scintigraphy, and [F-18]-DA PET. Fifteen of 16 patients had positive findings on CT and/or MRI consistent with the presence of pheochromocytoma. [F-18]-DAPETwas positive in all patients, but seven patients had negative [I-131]- MIBG scans. Thirty-eight foci of uptake were shown by both [F-18]- DA PET and [I-131]- MIBG scintigraphy, 90 only by [F-18]- DA PET, and 10 only by [I-131]MIBG; most lesions were also visible on CT/ MRI. In this initial series of patients with metastatic pheochromocytoma, [F-18]DA PET localized PHEO in all patients and showed a large number of foci that were not imaged with [I-131]- MIBG scintigraphy. Thus, [F-18]- DA PET was found to be a superior imaging method in patients with metastatic PHEO, in which correct detection of disease extension often determines the most appropriate therapeutic plan and future follow-up.