The gender gap in the United States: Housework across racialized groups

The gender gap in the United States: Housework across racialized groups
复制标题

美国的性别差距:不同种族群体的家务劳动

DOI:
10.4054/demres.2020.43.36
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
M. Kan
M. Kan
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kamila Kolpashnikova;M. Kan

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

背景:大多数基于资源的理论框架在家务劳动研究的基础上进行测试和进一步发展的“平均”模式。因此,在像美国这样的国家,这些框架严重依赖于白色妇女与白色男子之间的模式。因此,这些框架确定的基于资源的因素可能有助于估计白色美国人的家务分工,而不是任何其他群体,特别是种族化的妇女和男子。目的:我们测试的程度,以资源为基础的因素,如时间的可用性和收入可以占家务劳动参与的性别差距之间的白色,黑人和拉丁美洲的妇女和男子在美国。方法:使用Kitagawa的瓦哈卡Blinder分解方法,我们分析了2003 - 2018年美国时间使用调查的时间使用日记。结果如下:我们发现,只有当对比组之间存在实质性的资源差异时,基于资源的因素才能解释家务劳动参与的性别差距,但与美国黑人进行比较时除外。研究结果还表明,当任何一组妇女与黑人男子相比,资源为基础的因素几乎没有解释力组间的时间差距在家务劳动的参与。结论:研究结果意味着,家务劳动研究可能需要特别注意性别化和种族化对家务劳动分工的不同影响,以避免将仅适用于占主导地位的白色群体的理论框架规范化。贡献:本研究使用组级分解分析,比较如何资源为基础的因素适用于在美国的种族化群体的性别差距。
Background: Most resource-based theoretical frameworks in housework research are tested and further developed based on ‘average’ patterns. Consequently, in countries like the United States these frameworks rely heavily on the patterns among white women in relation to white men. As such, the resource-based factors identified by the frameworks may work to estimate the housework division of white Americans rather than any other groups, particularly racialized women and men. Objective: We test the extent to which resource-based factors such as time availability and income can account for the gender gap in housework participation among white, Black, and Latinx women and men in the United States. Methods: Using the Kitagawa‒Oaxaca‒Blinder decomposition method, we analyze time-use diaries from the 2003–2018 American Time Use Survey. Results: We find that resource-based factors account for the gender gap in housework participation only when there are substantial resource differences between the contrasted groups, the exception being when the comparison is made with Black Americans. The results also show that when any group of women is compared with Black men, resource-based factors have little explanatory power in the intergroup time gap in housework participation. Conclusions: The findings imply that housework research may need to pay special attention to the diverse effects of gendering and racialization on the division of housework to avoid normalizing the theoretical frameworks that only work for the dominant white groups. Contribution: This study uses group-level decomposition analysis to compare how resource-based factors apply to the gender gap across racialized groups in the United States.
金钱不是一切:妻子的收入和家务时间。
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.005
发表时间: 2010
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Killewald,Alexandra;Gough,Margaret
通讯作者: Gough,Margaret