Multiculture and Public Parks: Researching Super-diversity and Attachment in Public Green Space

Multiculture and Public Parks: Researching Super-diversity and Attachment in Public Green Space
复制标题

多元文化和公园:研究公共绿地的超级多样性和依恋

DOI:
10.1002/psp.1910
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
Population, Space and Place
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Neal S
Neal S
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Neal S

文献摘要

相似文献

在遭遇和公共空间的辩论中,借用非代表性理论方法,本文使用作者为期2年的经济和社会研究理事会研究项目的数据来考虑当地城市公园如何作为日常相遇,混合和地方归属的场所。本文探讨了公园作为绿色公共空间是如何重要的包容性开放的网站,而公园的物质性是一个关键的动态情感相遇过程。公园可以作为社会互动、参与性实践的动画师,并在种族和文化差异中建立亲和力。本文的结论是,欢乐的遭遇的概念可以扩展到包括选择性做法的概念-选择在共享的公共空间可以产生连接的情感,不一定是偶然的交换。在使用公园作为一个透镜来检查地方和多样性,本文批判性地反映了理解和描述多元文化的异质性形成的研究实践,并概述了该项目的研究设计和实地调查方法如何寻求仔细和适当地进行研究与复杂的不同的地方和人群版权© 2015约翰威利父子有限公司。
Situating itself in encounter and public space debates and borrowing from non‐representational theory approaches, this paper uses data from the authors' 2‐year Economic and Social Research Council research project to consider how local urban parks can work as sites of routine encounter, mixity, and place belonging. The paper explores how parks as green public spaces are important as sites of inclusive openness while the materiality of parks is a key dynamic in affective encounter processes. Parks can work as animators of social interactions, participatory practices, and place affinities across ethnic and cultural difference. The paper concludes that the concept of convivial encounter can be extended to incorporate the concept of elective practices – choosing to be in shared public space can generate connective sensibilities that are not necessarily contingent on exchange. In using parks as a lens to examine localities and diversity, the paper critically reflects on research practices for understanding and describing heterogeneous formations of multiculture and outlines how the project's research design and the fieldwork methods sought to carefully and appropriately undertake research with complexly different places and populations Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.