Commoning mobility: Towards a new politics of mobility transitions
Commoning mobility: Towards a new politics of mobility transitions
复制标题
共同流动性：迈向流动性转型的新政治
DOI：
10.1111/tran.12287
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Cristina Temenos
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Anna Nikolaeva;P. Adey;T. Cresswell;Jane Yeonjae Lee;André Nóvoa;Cristina Temenos
学者们认为，向更可持续和更公正的流动性过渡需要超越技术中心主义，重新思考流动性在城市、社区和社会中的意义。本文表明，这种重新思考本质上是政治性的。我们特别关注最近在地理文献中受到关注的共同实践的理论。根据我们对低碳出行转型的全球比较研究，我们认为批判出行学者可以通过参与公地封闭思维来重新思考和扩大对出行的理解。我们提出了一个新概念“共同流动性”，这一理论设想和塑造了发展更公平、更绿色的流动性和更具包容性、协作治理的社会的实践。我们的分析介绍了出行转型项目的三个“逻辑”。首先，本文讨论了稀缺逻辑如何成为出行规划的驱动力，因为石油、金融、空间和时间的稀缺在世界各地被视为对更环保、“更智能”和更便宜的出行的刺激。然后，本文确定了对稀缺逻辑的两种回应：紧缩逻辑和共享逻辑。研究严格的流动性是为了解决低碳转型中排放责任的分配以及随之而来的不公正和排斥问题。共享的逻辑显示出重新评估流动性的潜力，不仅将其视为个人自由，而且将其视为集体利益，为更公平的流动性转型和协作应对可持续流动性挑战铺平道路。
Scholars have argued that transitions to more sustainable and just mobilities require moving beyond technocentrism to rethink the very meaning of mobility in cities, communities, and societies. This paper demonstrates that such rethinking is inherently political. In particular, we focus on recent theorisations of commoning practices that have gained traction in geographic literatures. Drawing on our global comparative research of low‐carbon mobility transitions, we argue that critical mobilities scholars can rethink and expand the understanding of mobility through engagement with commons–enclosure thinking. We present a new concept, “commoning mobility,” a theorisation that both envisions and shapes practices that develop fairer and greener mobilities and more inclusive, collaboratively governed societies. Our analysis introduces three “logics” of mobility transition projects. First, the paper discusses how a logic of scarcity has been a driver for mobility planning as the scarcity of oil, finance, space, and time are invoked across the world as stimuli for aspiring to greener, “smarter,” and cheaper mobilities. The paper then identifies two responses to the logic of scarcity: the logics of austerity and the logics of commoning. Austere mobilities are examined to problematise the distribution of responsibility for emissions and ensuing injustices and exclusion in low‐carbon transitions. The logics of commoning shows a potential to reassess mobility not only as an individual freedom but also as a collective good, paving the way for fairer mobility transitions and a collaborative tackling of sustainable mobility challenges.
影响因子：
6.1
作者：
Goodman, Anna;Cheshire, James
通讯作者：
Cheshire, James
转型城镇网络 (TTN) 中的社区向低碳未来转型
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Aiken G
通讯作者：
Aiken G