Compensatory Justice The Question of Costs
Compensatory Justice The Question of Costs
复制标题
补偿性正义 成本问题
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1979
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
R. Amdur
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Amdur
N ADEQUATE THEORY O F compensatory justice should include answers to sets of questions, First, who is to receive compensation, and how much should they receive? Second, who should pay the costs of compensation, and how much should each pay? In the literature on preferential hiring, reverse discrimination, and affirmative action, the first set of questions has received far more attention than the second. Several writers have argued in favor of preferential treatment without considering the costs ofcompensation at all-suggesting either that the distribution of costs is not a major issue or that the solution to the problem is too obvious to require discussion. Others have dealt with the question of who should pay, but only briefly, after detailed and rigorous examinations of who should be compensated. By the time these writers reach the question of distribution of costs, everything else, including the proper mode of compensation, has been decided on. At this point, there are very few options left: the mode of compensation determines how the burden will be distributed. I want to suggest that the question of who should pay is a fundamental one. I t is too important to be postponed untilafter the rest of the problems concerning compensatory justice have been settled. In Part I of this essay, I put forward three principles intended to regulate distribution of the costs of compensation. In Parts I1 and 111, I ask whether these principles can be satisfied by programs involving preferential treatment for blacks and women.