Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: which is best for me?
Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: which is best for me?
复制标题
Google Scholar、Web of Science 和 Scopus：哪个最适合我？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Emilio Delgado
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Alberto Martín;E. Orduña;M. Thelwall;Emilio Delgado
能够在一个知识领域内发现、评估和安排新的研究，对于任何研究项目都是不可或缺的。对于社会科学家来说，这一过程越来越有可能发生在谷歌学者上，传统的学术数据库紧随其后。在这篇文章中，Alberto Martin-Martin，Enrique Ordna-Malea，Mike Thelwall，Emily io Delgado-Lopez-Cozar分析了谷歌学者、科学网和Scope这三个主要研究数据库的相对覆盖率，发现了社会科学和人文科学中的重大分歧，并建议研究人员在使用不同的数据库时面临权衡：在更全面但无序的系统和有序但有限的系统之间。
Being able to find, assess and place new research within a field of knowledge, is integral to any research project. For social scientists this process is increasingly likely to take place on Google Scholar, closely followed by traditional scholarly databases. In this post, Alberto Martin-Martin, Enrique Orduna-Malea , Mike Thelwall, Emilio Delgado-Lopez-Cozar, analyse the relative coverage of the three main research databases, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Scopus, finding significant divergences in the social sciences and humanities and suggest that researchers face a trade-off when using different databases: between more comprehensive, but disorderly systems and orderly, but limited systems.