Le schisme et la pourpre: Le cardinal Pierre d’Ailly, homme de science et de foi by Hélène Millet, Monique Maillard-Luypaert (review)
Le schisme et la pourpre: Le cardinal Pierre d’Ailly, homme de science et de foi by Hélène Millet, Monique Maillard-Luypaert (review)
复制标题
Le schisme et la pourpre: Le Cardinal Pierre d’Ailly, homme de science et de foi 作者：Hélène Millet, Monique Maillard-Luypaert（评论）
DOI：
10.1353/cat.2016.0220
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. A. Smoller
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. A. Smoller
《分裂与繁荣》：红衣主教皮埃尔·德·艾利，科学与信仰的人。作者：Helene Millet和Monique Maillard-Luypaert。（巴黎：塞尔夫出版社。2015. Pp. 350.平装本30，00欧元。ISBN 978-2-204-10475-3.）神学家、皇家牧师、大学校长、主教和红衣主教皮埃尔·德·艾利（Pierre d 'Ailly，1350-1420年）的一生经历了他那个时代的重大危机：百年战争;勃艮第人和阿马尼亚克人之间的冲突;最重要的是，大分裂。然而，他丰富的传记受到的关注远远少于他思想的各个方面。最后一次对达利生平的全面论述是伯纳德·盖尼的《国家与民族》（巴黎，1987年;芝加哥，1991年）的一部分;对于独立的传记，必须追溯到保罗·查克特（Paul Tschackert，1877年）和路易斯·萨伦比尔（Louis Salembier，1886年，1932年）的作品。因此，米勒和梅拉德-卢伊帕尔夫的这本引人入胜的传记是为大众所写的，是一本受欢迎的书，它给这一主题带来了自20世纪80年代以来出现的一些重要研究。正如这本书的后记清楚地表明，德艾利已经得到了一个坏的说唱在过去的东西：无论是从同时代谁成为他的敌人，或早期现代新教徒谁与约翰胡斯燃烧他，或大天主教徒谁痛惜他的关系，调解和阿维尼翁教皇。即使是Guenee的更平衡的待遇提出了d 'Ailly主要是作为一个精明的政治操作员。米勒和梅拉德-卢伊帕特在使他们的主人公成为一个更令人同情的人物方面走了很长的路，同时没有粉饰他职业生涯中的一些令人不安的时刻。这本书分为三大部分：第一部分提供了一个传记素描，第二部分详细介绍了1397年至1411年达伊担任康布雷主教期间的工作，第三部分审查了他的学术成果。随着米勒的备受推崇的专业知识对教会在大分裂和梅拉德Luypaert的无与伦比的知识档案在康布雷，作者的讨论红衣主教的教会学和他的时间在康布雷是特别丰富。达伊利的真诚奉献教会团结和尊严的教皇办公室来脱颖而出，因为作者详细介绍了他的行动相对于一个相对于分裂，甚至他长期坚持阿维尼翁教皇本笃十三世是作为显示一个令人钦佩的一致性，而教皇，其不妥协往往是归咎于分裂的延长，来为赞扬作为一个人的智慧，虔诚，和尊严（第100页）。…
Le schisme et la pourpre: Le cardinal Pierre d'Ailly, homme de science et de foi. By Helene Millet and Monique Maillard-Luypaert. (Paris: Les Editions du Cerf. 2015. Pp. 350. euro30,00 paperback. ISBN 978-2-204-10475-3.)Theologian, royal chaplain, university leader, bishop, and cardinal, Pierre d'Ailly (1350-1420) led a life that intersected with the major crises of his day: the Hundred Years' War; the conflict between Burgundians and Armagnacs; and, above all, the Great Schism. And yet, his rich biography has received far less attention than various aspects of his thought. The last thorough treatment of d'Ailly's life formed part of Bernard Guenee's Entre lEglise et lEtat (Paris, 1987; Chicago, 1991); for freestanding biographies, one must go back to the works of Paul Tschackert (1877) and Louis Salembier (1886, 1932). Millet and Maillard-Luypaerf s engaging biography, written with a popular audience in mind, is thus a welcome offering, bringing to bear upon its subject a number of important studies that have appeared since the 1980s. As the book's epilogue makes clear, d'Ailly has gotten something of a bad rap in the past: whether from contemporaries who became his enemies, or early-modern Protestants who associated him with the burning of John Hus, or arch-Catholics who deplored his ties to conciliarism and the Avignon papacy. Even Guenee's more balanced treatment presents d'Ailly largely as a shrewd political operator. Millet and Maillard-Luypaert go a long way toward making their subject a more sympathetic figure while not whitewashing some troubling moments in his career.The book is divided into three large sections: the first offering a biographical sketch proper, the second detailing d'Ailly's work while bishop of Cambrai from 1397 to 1411, and the third examining his scholarly output. With Millet's muchadmired expertise about the Church during the Great Schism and Maillard-Luypaert's unparalleled knowledge of the archives in Cambrai, the authors' discussions of the cardinal's ecclesiology and of his time in Cambrai are especially rich. D'Ailly's sincere dedication to church unity-and to the dignity of the papal office-comes to the fore as the authors detail his actions vis-a-vis the Schism; even his long adherence to the Avignon pope Benedict XIII is presented as showing an admirable consistency, while that pontiff, whose intransigence is often blamed for the Schism's prolongation, comes up for praise as a man of intelligence, piety, and dignity (pp. …