Normative practices, narrative fallacies? International reinsurance and its history
Normative practices, narrative fallacies? International reinsurance and its history
复制标题
规范做法、叙述谬误？
DOI：
10.1080/00076791.2020.1808885
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
1.1
通讯作者：
R. Pearson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Pearson
摘要再保险通常被认为是建立在个人关系、善意和相互信任基础上的业务。然而，在其历史的不同时期，观察家们警告说，技术和其他变化威胁到该行业规范做法的生存。本文探讨了再保险的微观业务所涉及的内容以及该业务自成立以来的变化。它提出了问题的表征规范再保险实践和记忆的作用，在评估的连续性和变化。
Abstract Reinsurance is often characterised as a business built on personal relationships, goodwill and mutual trust. However, at different times in its history observers have warned that technological and other changes threaten the survival of normative practices in the industry. This article investigates what was involved in the micro-business of reinsurance and how that business changed since its early days. It raises questions about the characterization of normative reinsurance practice and about the role of memory in the assessment of continuity and change.
快与慢的思考：跨时间尺度的优化分解
DOI：
10.1109/cdc.2017.8263834
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
56th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
影响因子：
--
作者：
Goel, Gautam;Chen, Niangjun;Wierman, Adam
通讯作者：
Wierman, Adam