Parsing the Practice Turn: Practice, Practical Knowledge, Practices
Parsing the Practice Turn: Practice, Practical Knowledge, Practices
复制标题
解析实践转：实践、实践知识、实践
DOI：
10.1177/0305829815613045
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Jorg Kustermans
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jorg Kustermans
大量文献都围绕着“实践”这一概念展开。本文分析了国际关系的实践转向。这表明“实践”的含义是一个不断变化的目标。有时这意味着过程。有时它指的是一种特定类型的知识和相关行为。有时它被用作制度的准同义词。实践转向实际上有三个概念：“实践”、“实践知识”和“实践”。这些概念来自不同的知识领域，导致了解释和理解国际关系的不同方式。这篇文章介绍了这三个概念，解释了每个概念如何对变化的性质和可能性进行了特定的解释，并提供了特定的和平(缔造)理论。
A substantial body of literature centers on the concept of ‘practice’. This article parses the practice turn in International Relations. It suggests that the meaning of ‘practice’ is a moving target. Sometimes it means process. Sometimes it refers to a particular type of knowledge and related action. And sometimes it is used as a quasi-synonym for institution. There are actually three concepts animating the practice turn: ‘practice’, ‘practical knowledge’, and ‘practices’. These concepts hail from different intellectual pastures and lead to different ways of explaining and understanding international relations. The article introduces the three concepts, explains how each concept entails a particular interpretation of the nature and possibility of change, as well as affords a particular theory of peace(making).