Meniscal Allografts: Biomechanical Consequences of Different Methods of Fixation
Meniscal Allografts: Biomechanical Consequences of Different Methods of Fixation
复制标题
同种异体半月板移植物:不同固定方法的生物力学后果
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
S. Maher
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hongsheng Wang;Tony Chen;A. Gee;I. Hutchinson;K. Stoner;R. Warren;S. Maher
Complete removal of the meniscus (meniscectomy) often leads to early-onset of osteoarthritis due to changes in contact mechanics1,2. To counteract these changes, the removed meniscus is often replaced with an allograft. Many variables can affect the surgical outcome of meniscal transplantation (bone geometry, graft size, fixation technique, level of activity, limb alignment, etc.)3,4,5. Among them, the method of fixation is the most readily controlled. Two commonly used techniques are: (i) trans-osseous suture fixation via bone plugs, where bone plugs are machined at the anterior and posterior horns of the graft and implanted into appropriately sized tibial bone tunnels, and (ii) suture fixation at the meniscal horns, where the sutures are drawn through tibial bone tunnels and tied over a bone-bridge. But the mechanical consequences of these fixation techniques, specifically, how they affect knee mechanics are unclear.Copyright © 2013 by ASME