Bridging the gap: reply to discussion of "Guiding principles for hydrologists conducting interdisciplinary research and fieldwork with participants"
Bridging the gap: reply to discussion of "Guiding principles for hydrologists conducting interdisciplinary research and fieldwork with participants"
复制标题
弥合差距：回复“水文学家与参与者进行跨学科研究和实地考察的指导原则”的讨论
DOI：
10.1080/02626667.2022.2060111
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Rangecroft S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rangecroft S
在这篇回复中，我们感谢两位作者对我们最初的观点文章“水文学家与参与者进行跨学科研究和实地工作的指导原则”的深思熟虑的见解。我们相信这些讨论将有助于启发和指导当前和未来的研究人员，并说明如何继续汇集物理和社会数据、经验和观点，并弥合两个学科之间在社会水文学主题方面的差距。此外，我们相信这些见解和经验将有助于促进参与这些讨论和研究的水文学家和自然科学家更深入的理解。在这里，我们重点关注匡特和哈夫纳答复中的两个重要主题：（1）进一步讨论感知和生活经验的重要性； (2) 进一步讨论协作工作和一些主要的外部障碍。
In this reply we thank both authors for their thoughtful insights on our original opinion piece “Guiding principles for hydrologists conducting interdisciplinary research and fieldwork with participants.” We believe these discussions will help to inspire and guide current and future researchers and illustrate how to continue to bring together physical and social data, experiences, and perspectives, and bridge the gap between the two disciplines with respect to socio-hydrological topics. Furthermore, we are confident that these insights and experiences will help foster a deeper understanding for hydrologists and natural scientists engaging with these discussions and research. Here we focus on two important themes that cut across both Quandt and Haeffner’s replies: (1) further discussions on the importance of perceptions and lived experiences; and (2) further discussions on collaborative working and some of the major external barriers.