Air pollution and human cognition: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Air pollution and human cognition: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
复制标题
空气污染和人类认知:系统评价和荟萃分析。
DOI:
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160234
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Thompson R
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Thompson R
BackgroundThis systematic review summarises and evaluates the literature investigating associations between exposure to air pollution and general population cognition, which has important implications for health, social and economic inequalities, and human productivity.MethodsThe engines MEDLINE, Embase Classic+Embase, APA PsycInfo, and SCOPUS were searched up to May 2022. Our inclusion criteria focus on the following pollutants: particulate matter, NOx, and ozone. The cognitive abilities of interest are: general/global cognition, executive function, attention, working memory, learning, memory, intelligence and IQ, reasoning, reaction times, and processing speed. The collective evidence was assessed using the NTP-OHAT framework and random-effects meta-analyses.ResultsEighty-six studies were identified, the results of which were generally supportive of associations between exposures and worsened cognition, but the literature was varied and sometimes contradictory. There was moderate certainty support for detrimental associations between PM2.5and general cognition in adults 40+, and PM2.5, NOx, and PM10and executive function (especially working memory) in children. There was moderate certainty evidence against associations between ozone and general cognition in adults age 40+, and NOx and reasoning/IQ in children. Some associations were also supported by meta-analysis (N = 14 studies, all in adults aged 40+). A 1 μg/m3increase in NO2was associated with reduced performance on general cognitive batteries (β = −0.02,p< 0.05) as was a 1 μg/m3increase in PM2.5exposure (β = −0.02,p< 0.05). A 1μgm3increase in PM2.5was significantly associated with lower verbal fluency by −0.05 words (p= 0.01) and a decrease in executive function task performance of −0.02 points (p< 0.001).DiscussionEvidence was found in support of some exposure-outcome associations, however more good quality research is required, particularly with older teenagers and young adults (14–40 years), using multi-exposure modelling, incorporating mechanistic investigation, and in South America, Africa, South Asia and Australasia.