Resolving semantic interference during word production requires central attention.

Resolving semantic interference during word production requires central attention.
复制标题

解决词语生成过程中的语义干扰需要集中注意力。

DOI:
10.1037/a0033095
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Kleinman,Daniel
Kleinman,Daniel
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kleinman,Daniel

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

语义图-词干扰任务被用来诊断说话人如何解决竞争,而选择的话生产。在2个双任务实验(色调分类,然后由图片命名)的注意力需求,这一决议的过程进行了评估。在实验一中,当图片和干扰词同时呈现时,当任务最大程度重叠时,没有观察到语义干扰。这复制了文献中的一个关键发现,即语义图片-单词干扰不需要能力有限的中央注意力资源,并且发生在词汇选择之前,这一解释与所有主要的单词产生理论的主张背道而驰。在另一个实验1条件下,当图片后250 ms出现干扰物时,当任务最大程度重叠时就会出现干扰。总之,这些研究结果支持一个帐户中,干扰决议和词汇选择都需要中央资源,但激活的词汇表征书面文字不。随后的分析表明,在以前的复制尝试中获得的不一致的结果可能是由于不同语言之间的语音(ir)规律性的差异。实验二采用累积语义干扰范式对语义干扰程度进行操作。干扰观察到的任务重叠,确认词汇选择需要中央资源。总之,这些研究结果表明,词汇选择轨迹的语义图片-单词干扰和模型的单词生产,假设这样一个轨迹可能会保留。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2020阿帕,保留所有权利)
The semantic picture–word interference task has been used to diagnose how speakers resolve competition while selecting words for production. The attentional demands of this resolution process were assessed in 2 dual-task experiments (tone classification followed by picture naming). In Experiment 1, when pictures and distractor words were presented simultaneously, semantic interference was not observed when tasks maximally overlapped. This replicates a key finding from the literature that suggested that semantic picture–word interference does not require capacity-limited central attentional resources and occurs prior to lexical selection, an interpretation that runs counter to the claims of all major theories of word production. In another Experiment 1 condition, when distractors were presented 250 ms after pictures, interference emerged when tasks maximally overlapped. Together, these findings support an account in which interference resolution and lexical selection both require central resources, but the activation of lexical representations from written words does not. Subsequent analysis revealed that discrepant results obtained in previous replication attempts may be attributable to differences in phonological (ir) regularity between languages. In Experiment 2, degree of semantic interference was manipulated using the cumulative semantic interference paradigm. Interference was observed regardless of task overlap, confirming that lexical selection requires central resources. Together, these findings indicate that a lexical selection locus of semantic picture–word interference—and models of word production that assume such a locus—may be retained.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)