Digital ethnography: Principles and practice

Digital ethnography: Principles and practice
复制标题

数字民族志:原理与实践

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
D. Alinejad
D. Alinejad
中科院分区:
人文科学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
D. Alinejad

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

不希望在理论特征和分析工具上妥协的学者。门泽尔对英德语料库中衔接关系中的省略进行了细致而有思想的比较。她指出,很难找到可比较的文本类型和结果,并指出需要手动转录口语数据。Shagalov和Fine通过对精神分裂症和躁狂症患者的临床访谈,使用UAM CorpusTool对语料库进行注释和分析,并开发了46个语言变量,以确定变量组合的“最佳子集”,从而更准确地对精神分裂症或躁狂症患者的语言进行分类。明确了这类工作对临床诊断的重要性。也许是由于章节过多(包括引言在内共21章),以及篇幅的限制,有些章节缺乏详细的分析和讨论。然而,作为一个整体,由于内容、计算方法和语料库工具的多样性,该卷将吸引广泛的话语分析研究人员。本书还涵盖了相当广泛的外语概念、分析层次和框架,包括词典语法、语域、发展方法、多模态、体裁、评价和衔接。然而,奥哈洛伦(O 'Halloran, 2015)在“多模式数字人文学科”方面的工作可能已经包括在内。对于那些刚接触SFL理论的人来说,大多数章节不需要太多的理论背景知识。本卷后半部分的一个特别明显的主题是,由于词典语法的多功能性质和基于意义的理论焦点,从SFL的角度来看,在开发和适应计算语言工具以进行文本分析方面仍然存在挑战。
scholars who do not wish to compromise on theoretical features and analytical tools. Menzel presents a very careful and thoughtful comparison of ellipsis in cohesive ties in an English-German corpus. She notes the difficulty in finding comparable text types and results and notes the need to manually transcribe spoken data. Shagalov and Fine work through clinical interviews of speakers with schizophrenia and mania, annotate and analyze the corpus using the UAM CorpusTool, and develop 46 linguistic variables to determine the “best subset” of combinations of variables which can more accurately classify the language of speakers with schizophrenia or mania. The importance of this kind of work for clinical diagnosis is made clear. Perhaps due to the large number of chapters (21 including the introduction) and likely constraints on space, some chapters lacked detailed analyses and discussions. Nevertheless, as a whole, the volume will appeal to a wide range of researchers in discourse analysis due to the variety in content, computational methodologies, and corpus tools. There is also a fairly broad spectrum of SFL concepts and analytical levels and frameworks covered, including lexicogrammar, register, method of development, multimodality, genre, appraisal, and cohesion. One area of work that might have been included, however, is O’Halloran’s (2015) work on “multimodal digital humanities.” For those new to SFL theory, most chapters do not require too much background in the theory. A theme particularly evident in the latter part of the volume is that there remain challenges in developing and adapting computational linguistic tools to text analysis from an SFL perspective because of the multifunctional nature of the lexicogrammar and the meaning-based focus of the theory.