Blind Insights? The Limits of a Reflexive Sociology of Law
Blind Insights? The Limits of a Reflexive Sociology of Law
复制标题
盲目的洞察力？
DOI：
10.1111/1467-6478.00098
复制
发表时间：
1998
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D. Nelken
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Nelken
法律的社会学方法是否有最终按照自己的形象创造法律的危险？他们可以设定自己的限制吗？它们能否进一步帮助而不是阻碍法律变得更加技术官僚的进程？本文继续与罗杰·科特雷尔 (Roger Cotterrell) 进行辩论，对上一期中科特雷尔 (Cotterrell) 的建议进行了检验，即只要对法律思想的社会学解释承认对法律而非学术社会学的忠诚，这些危险就可以避免。相比之下，我提出了一种反思策略，旨在邀请社会学来审视其话语和实践与法律的相似之处和不同之处。
Is there a danger that sociological approaches to law end up creating law in their own image? Can they set their own limits? Could they help further rather than hinder the process by which law becomes more technocratic? Continuing a debate with Roger Cotterrell, this paper offers an examination of Cotterrell's suggestion, in the last issue, that these dangers can be avoided provided that sociological interpretation of legal ideas recognizes an allegiance to law rather than to academic sociology. By contrast, I propose a reflexive strategy intended to invite sociology to examine the ways in which its discourses and practices are both similar to but also different from those of law.