Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.
复制标题
AMSTAR的开发：评估系统评价方法学质量的测量工具。
DOI：
10.1186/1471-2288-7-10
复制
发表时间：
2007-02-15
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Bouter, Lex M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Shea, Beverley J.;Grimshaw, Jeremy M.;Wells, George A.;Boers, Maarten;Andersson, Neil;Hamel, Candyce;Porter, Ashley C.;Tugwell, Peter;Moher, David;Bouter, Lex M.
我们的目标是开发一种工具来评估系统评价的方法学质量，建立在以前的工具，经验证据和专家共识的基础上。一个37项的评估工具是通过结合1）增强的概述质量评估问卷（OQAQ），2）由萨克斯创建的检查表，3）最近被认为具有方法学重要性的三个额外项目而形成的。该工具应用于99篇纸质系统评价和52篇电子系统评价。探索性因素分析被用来确定潜在的组件。方法学专家使用名义组技术，旨在减少项目和设计一个评估工具的表面和内容的有效性的结果进行了审议。因子分析确定了11个组成部分。从每个组成部分中，由标称组选择一个项目。由此产生的工具被认为具有表面和内容效度。开发了一种用于“多系统评价评估”（AMSTAR）的测量工具。该工具由11个条目组成，具有良好的表面效度和内容效度，可用于测量系统评价的方法学质量。在对AMSTAR的使用提出强有力的建议之前，还需要进行更多的研究，重点是AMSTAR的再现性和结构效度。
Our objective was to develop an instrument to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews, building upon previous tools, empirical evidence and expert consensus. A 37-item assessment tool was formed by combining 1) the enhanced Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire (OQAQ), 2) a checklist created by Sacks, and 3) three additional items recently judged to be of methodological importance. This tool was applied to 99 paper-based and 52 electronic systematic reviews. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify underlying components. The results were considered by methodological experts using a nominal group technique aimed at item reduction and design of an assessment tool with face and content validity. The factor analysis identified 11 components. From each component, one item was selected by the nominal group. The resulting instrument was judged to have face and content validity. A measurement tool for the 'assessment of multiple systematic reviews' (AMSTAR) was developed. The tool consists of 11 items and has good face and content validity for measuring the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Additional studies are needed with a focus on the reproducibility and construct validity of AMSTAR, before strong recommendations can be made on its use.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Moher D;Sampson M;Campbell K;Beckner W;Lepage L;Gaboury I;Berman B
通讯作者：
Berman B
影响因子：
120.7
作者：
DICKERSIN, K
通讯作者：
DICKERSIN, K
影响因子：
105.7
作者：
OXMAN, AD
通讯作者：
OXMAN, AD
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
Downs, SH;Black, N
通讯作者：
Black, N
DOI：
10.1002/0470870168
发表时间：
2005-01-01
期刊：
PUBLICATION BIAS IN META-ANALYSIS: PREVENTION, ASSESSMENT AND ADJUSTMENTS
影响因子：
--
作者：
Rothstein, Hannah R.;Sutton, Alexander J.;Borenstein, Michael
通讯作者：
Borenstein, Michael