Quality of collaboration in design meetings: methodological reflexions
Quality of collaboration in design meetings: methodological reflexions
复制标题
设计会议中的协作质量：方法论反思
DOI：
10.1080/15710882.2012.729063
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Jean
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
F. Détienne;M. Baker;Jean
本文提供了一个关键的评估方法，分析质量的合作设计会议。经过讨论如何有效的合作可以成功的设计，一些现有的方法来评估合作的质量进行审查，并提出了一个具体的方法，分析和评估社会认知过程中涉及的设计会议的一些细节，连同它的优点和缺点。最后的讨论旨在深化和扩展以前的方法，以期勾勒出未来的研究前景。需要考虑到人际关系的动态，涉及相互调节的紧张局势和影响的额外层面进行了讨论。有人认为，有没有特权的角度来评估合作的质量：质量优先将取决于合作设计活动的对象，什么是利害关系，以及社会参与者，包括研究人员的替代观点。阐明多个视图的协作质量的问题进行了讨论。
This paper provides a critical appraisal of methods for analysing the quality of collaboration in design meetings. After a discussion of how effective collaboration can be related to successful design, some existing approaches to evaluating the quality of collaboration are reviewed, and one specific method for analysing and evaluating socio-cognitive processes involved in design meetings is presented in some detail, together with its strengths and weaknesses. The concluding discussion aims to deepen and extend previous methods, with a view to outlining future research perspectives. The need for taking into account the additional dimension of the dynamics of interpersonal relations, involving the mutual regulation of tensions and affects, is discussed. It is argued that there is no privileged standpoint from which to evaluate the quality of collaboration: the qualities to which precedence will be given depend on the objects of co-design activities, what is at stake, and the alternative viewpoints of social actors involved, including researchers. The problem of articulating multiple views of the quality of collaboration is discussed.