The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review.
The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1098/rsos.150547
复制
发表时间：
2016-01
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Zwaan RA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Morey RD;Chambers CD;Etchells PJ;Harris CR;Hoekstra R;Lakens D;Lewandowsky S;Morey CC;Newman DP;Schönbrodt FD;Vanpaemel W;Wagenmakers EJ;Zwaan RA
开放性是科学的核心价值观之一。开放的科学实践（例如与发表的文章一起共享数据、材料和分析脚本）有很多好处，包括更容易复制和扩展研究，增加理论构建和荟萃分析的数据可用性，以及即使在论文发表后也增加审查和合作的可能性。尽管现代信息技术使共享比以往任何时候都更加容易，但开放实践的采用却进展缓慢。我们认为，这可能部分是由于激励措施错位所引起的社会困境，并提出了一种具体的、具体的机制——审查者拒绝全面审查——以实现作为科学原则问题创造开放实践期望的目标。
Openness is one of the central values of science. Open scientific practices such as sharing data, materials and analysis scripts alongside published articles have many benefits, including easier replication and extension studies, increased availability of data for theory-building and meta-analysis, and increased possibility of review and collaboration even after a paper has been published. Although modern information technology makes sharing easier than ever before, uptake of open practices had been slow. We suggest this might be in part due to a social dilemma arising from misaligned incentives and propose a specific, concrete mechanism—reviewers withholding comprehensive review—to achieve the goal of creating the expectation of open practices as a matter of scientific principle.