OBJECT SEARCH IN NONSCENE DISPLAYS
OBJECT SEARCH IN NONSCENE DISPLAYS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.456
复制
发表时间：
1988-07-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
KLATSKY, GJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BIEDERMAN, I;BLICKLE, TW;KLATSKY, GJ
当我们看着椅子或长颈鹿时，我们无法抑制对该形象的语义解读，尽管我们不需要命名它(例如，Smith&McGee，1980)。鉴于对象图像的分类是强制性的，它是免费的吗？受试者试图在一到六张普通物体的图片的非场景(钟面)排列的100ms显示中检测由基本级别名称指定的目标物体的存在或不存在。作为显示器中的对象数量的函数，可检测性急剧单调下降，这表明在这些条件下的对象检测是一个需要注意的过程。对于可能与干扰物同时出现的目标，没有观察到任何好处。后一种结果是对在真实世界场景中发现的不可能对象的感知干扰的描述的证据，该描述认为干扰来自对象的清单，而不考虑它们的空间关系。(心理信息数据库记录(C)2016 APA，保留所有权利)
When we look at a chair or a giraffe we cannot suppress a semantic interpretation of that image, although we need not name it (eg, Smith & McGee, 1980). Given that classification of object images is mandatory, is it capacity free? Subjects attempted to detect the presence or absence of a target object, specified by basic-level name, in a 100-ms display of a nonscene (clock face) arrangement of one to six pictures of common objects. There was a sharp monotonic decrease in detectability as a function of the number of objects in the display, indicating that object detection under these conditions is an attention-demanding process. No benefit was observed for targets that were likely to co-occur with the distractors. This latter result is evidence against an account of the perceptual interference found for improbable objects in real-world scenes, which holds that the interference derives from an inventory listing of the objects without regard to their spatial relations.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)