Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: is primed evidence discounted, even when it reliably indicates the correct answer?
Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: is primed evidence discounted, even when it reliably indicates the correct answer?
复制标题
短期重复启动中的主要诊断性：即使启动证据可靠地表明了正确答案，它是否会被打折扣？
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.257
复制
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Shiffrin,RichardM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Weidemann,ChristophT;Huber,DavidE;Shiffrin,RichardM
作者进行了 4 次重复启动实验，在视觉强制选择感知识别任务中操纵启动持续时间和启动诊断性。主要诊断性的强度和方向对识别准确性产生显着影响，但这些影响对诊断性的后续变化具有抵抗力。参与者学会了将不同的诊断与不同持续时间的素数联系起来，但不与以不同颜色呈现的素数联系起来。无论主要诊断性如何，对主要替代方案的偏好与主要持续时间呈负向协变，这表明即使对于诊断主要诊断，证据折扣仍然是一个重要因素。计算模型解释了这些结果，假设适应实验统计数据会调节证据折扣水平。（PsycINFO 数据库记录 (c) 2016 APA，保留所有权利）
The authors conducted 4 repetition priming experiments that manipulated prime duration and prime diagnosticity in a visual forced-choice perceptual identification task. The strength and direction of prime diagnosticity produced marked effects on identification accuracy, but those effects were resistant to subsequent changes of diagnosticity. Participants learned to associate different diagnosticities with primes of different durations but not with primes presented in different colors. Regardless of prime diagnosticity, preference for a primed alternative covaried negatively with prime duration, suggesting that even for diagnostic primes, evidence discounting remains an important factor. A computational model, with the assumption that adaptation to the statistics of the experiment modulates the level of evidence discounting, accounted for these results.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)