Quality of Care for Atrial Fibrillation Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure
Quality of Care for Atrial Fibrillation Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.091
复制
发表时间:
2009-09-29
影响因子:
24
通讯作者:
Fonarow, Gregg C.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Piccini, Jonathan P.;Hernandez, Adrian F.;Fonarow, Gregg C.
Objectives This study sought to examine quality of care and warfarin use at discharge in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF).Background Atrial fibrillation is common in HF, and national guidelines recommend discharge on warfarin for stroke prophylaxis. However, the frequency and factors associated with the guideline adherence are poorly described.Methods We analyzed 72,534 HF admissions from January 2005 through March 2008 at 255 hospitals participating in the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines HF program. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent factors associated with warfarin use at discharge.Results In this HF population, 20.5% (n = 14,901) had AF on admission, whereas another 13.7% (n = 9,918) had a prior history of AF but were in a regular rhythm at admission. Contraindications to warfarin therapy were documented in 9.2%. Among eligible HF patients without contraindications, the median prevalence of warfarin therapy at discharge was 64.9% (interquartile range 55.5 to 73.4) and did not improve during the 3.5 years of study. After adjustment, major factors associated with no warfarin use at discharge included increasing age, nonwhite race, anemia, and treatment in the south. Warfarin use also varied inversely with CHADS(2) (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age >75, diabetes, and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack) risk (70.9% to 59.5% for CHADS2 score 1 to 6, p < 0.0001).Conclusions Guideline-recommended warfarin use in patients with AF and HF is less than optimal, has not improved over time, and varies significantly according to age, race, risk profile, region, and hospital site. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 1280-9) (C) 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation