Open Science in Software Engineering

Open Science in Software Engineering
复制标题

软件工程中的开放科学

DOI:
10.1007/978-3-030-32489-6_17
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
H. Seibold
H. Seibold
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Daniel Méndez Fernández;D. Graziotin;S. Wagner;H. Seibold

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

开放科学描述了向公众提供任何研究成果的运动,包括但不限于开放获取、开放数据和开放源码。虽然开放科学在其他科学学科中已成为普遍接受的标准,但在软件工程中,我们仍在努力使开放科学适应我们学科的特殊性,使我们科学界的进展变得困难。在这一章中,我们思考软件工程的开放科学的本质,包括开放科学是什么,为什么我们应该从事它,以及我们应该如何从事它。我们特别借鉴我们作为实施开放科学倡议的会议主席和积极从事开放科学的研究人员的经验,批判性地讨论挑战和陷阱,并讨论更高级的主题,如如何以及在什么条件下共享预印本,涵盖哪些基础设施和许可模式,或者如何在不同审查模式的限制下共享预印本,如双盲审查。我们希望帮助建立一个共同点,并为使开放科学成为软件工程的规范做出贡献。
Open science describes the movement of making any research artifact available to the public and includes, but is not limited to, open access, open data, and open source. While open science is becoming generally accepted as a norm in other scientific disciplines, in software engineering, we are still struggling in adapting open science to the particularities of our discipline, rendering progress in our scientific community cumbersome. In this chapter, we reflect upon the essentials in open science for software engineering including what open science is, why we should engage in it, and how we should do it. We particularly draw from our experiences made as conference chairs implementing open science initiatives and as researchers actively engaging in open science to critically discuss challenges and pitfalls and to address more advanced topics such as how and under which conditions to share preprints, what infrastructure and licence model to cover, or how do it within the limitations of different reviewing models, such as double-blind reviewing. Our hope is to help establishing a common ground and to contribute to make open science a norm also in software engineering.
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1990.03440100097014
发表时间: 1990-03
期刊: JAMA
影响因子: --
作者:
K. Dickersin
通讯作者: K. Dickersin