Networked governance and the post-regulatory state? Steering, rowing and anchoring the provision of policing and security
Networked governance and the post-regulatory state? Steering, rowing and anchoring the provision of policing and security
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1362480606068874
复制
发表时间：
2006-11-01
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Crawford, Adam
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Crawford, Adam
本文结合了“（后）监管国家”文献的见解，批判性地探索了警务和安全的变化面貌。它将“网络化治理”和“响应式监管”的概念置于英国背景下的实证检验之下。本文阐述了国家锚定如何构成当代安全治理的鲜明特征。它表明，就社会行为的监管而言，英国政府非但没有退出，反而参与了雄心勃勃的社会工程项目，在这些项目中，等级制度、命令和干预主义的部署非常普遍。在行为政治化的背景下，最近的社会监管趋势出现了过度创新。在这种背景下，文章强调了对“响应式监管”可行性的担忧。
This article engages with insights from the '(post-) regulatory state' literature in critically exploring the changing face of policing and security. It subjects notions of 'networked governance' and,responsive regulation' to empirical examination in the British context. The article illustrates the manner in which state anchoring constitutes a distinctive characteristic of contemporary security governance. It suggests that far from state withdrawal, in relation to the regulation of social behaviour, the British state is engaged in ambitious projects of social engineering in which the deployment of hierarchy, command and interventionism are prevalent. Recent trends in social regulation have seen hyper-innovation against a background of the politicization of behaviour. In this context, the article highlights concerns about the feasibility of 'responsive regulation'.