Conversion Table for Running on Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmills

Conversion Table for Running on Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmills
复制标题

在下半身正压跑步机上跑步的换算表

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2015
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
DE Heer
DE Heer
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
John;R.;Kline;Scot Raab;J.;Richard Coast;Roger;G.;Bounds;David;P. K;Mcneill;Hendrik;D.;DE Heer

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

摘要克莱恩,JR,拉布,S,海岸,JR,边界,RG,麦克尼尔,DKP和德海尔,HD。一种用于运行在下体正压粉碎机上的转换台。J Strength Cond Res 29(3):854-862,2015-下体正压(LBPP)或反重力跑步机在运动和康复环境中越来越受欢迎。以降低的体重(BW)跑步可以降低代谢成本,这可以通过以更快的速度跑步来抵消。然而,到目前为止,人们还不知道一个人必须跑得多快才能抵消代谢成本的降低。本研究旨在开发一个用户友好的转换表,显示LBPP跑步机上所需的速度,以匹配在一系列体重支持的常规非LBPP跑步机上的等效代谢输出。共有20名休闲跑步者(11名男性,9名女性)在常规跑步机上跑多个3分钟间隔,然后在LBPP跑步机上以6种不同的BW(50- 100%,10%增量)跑。记录代谢输出,并在常规和LBPP跑步机会话之间进行匹配。使用回归分析,成功创建了在常规跑步机上以0.8 km·h − 1(0.5 mph)增量从6.4至16.1 km·h − 1(4至10 mph)的速度和在LBPP跑步机上体重比例为50、60、70、80、90和100%的转换表。该表显示,在LBPP跑步机上,需要更多的支持(p < 0.001),但在更高的速度(p < 0.001),增加的比例较小。这项研究对教练或从业者使用或规定LBPP跑步机上的训练有影响。
Abstract Kline, JR, Raab, S, Coast, JR, Bounds, RG, McNeill, DKP, and de Heer, HD. A conversion table for running on lower body positive pressure treadmills. J Strength Cond Res 29(3): 854–862, 2015—Lower body positive pressure (LBPP) or antigravity treadmills are becoming increasingly popular in sports and rehabilitation settings. Running at a decreased body weight (BW) reduces metabolic cost, which can be offset by running at faster speeds. To date, however, little is known about how much faster someone must run to offset the reduced metabolic cost. This study aimed to develop a user-friendly conversion table showing the speeds required on an LBPP treadmill to match the equivalent metabolic output on a regular, non-LBPP, treadmill across a range of body weight supports. A total of 20 recreational runners (11 males, 9 females) ran multiple 3-minute intervals on a regular treadmill and then on an LBPP treadmill at 6 different BWs (50–100%, 10% increments). Metabolic outputs were recorded and matched between the regular and LBPP treadmill sessions. Using regression analyses, a conversion table was successfully created for the speeds from 6.4 to 16.1 km·h−1 (4 to 10 mph) in 0.8 km·h−1 (0.5 mph) increments on the regular treadmill and BW proportions of 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100% on an LBPP treadmill. The table showed that a greater increase in speed on the LBPP treadmill was needed with more support (p < 0.001) but that the proportion increase was smaller at higher speeds (p < 0.001). This research has implications for coaches or practitioners using or prescribing training on an LBPP treadmill.
DOI: 10.3357/asem.2693.2010
发表时间: 2010-06
期刊: Aviation, space, and environmental medicine
影响因子: --
作者:
H. Ruckstuhl;T. Schlabs;Armando Rosales-velderrain;A. Hargens
通讯作者: H. Ruckstuhl;T. Schlabs;Armando Rosales-velderrain;A. Hargens