Motivation and Self-Efficacy in the Context of Moderated Drinking: Global Self-Report and Ecological Momentary Assessment

Motivation and Self-Efficacy in the Context of Moderated Drinking: Global Self-Report and Ecological Momentary Assessment
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/a0031194
复制
发表时间:
2013-12-01
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Morgenstern, Jon
Morgenstern, Jon
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kuerbis, Alexis;Armeli, Stephen;Morgenstern, Jon

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

尽管有大量的研究证明了动机和自我效能在戒酒背景下预测饮酒的作用,但很少有研究明确探讨它们在适度背景下的作用,也没有人使用日常日记方法。本研究的目的是:(a)探索动机和自我效能的总体自我报告和每日日记复合测量之间的一致性;(b)在一项以控制饮酒为重点的简短AUD治疗研究的背景下,比较两者预测饮酒结果的能力。问题饮酒者(N = 89)被评估,提供了关于他们饮酒的反馈,并被随机分配到三种情况中的一种:两种简短的AUD治疗或第三组要求自己改变。在基线和第8周(治疗结束)进行全球自我报告(GSR)测量。在基线前一周和第8周前一周,通过交互式语音记录系统收集数据,创建每日日记复合材料(DDC)。研究结果显示,在基线和第8周,GSR和DDC之间存在一些一致性,表明两种方法捕获了一些相同的结构;然而,他们各自与饮酒的关系有所不同。基线和第8周的DDC显著预测第8周的饮酒结果,而只有GSR的变化显著预测饮酒结果。研究结果表明,动机和自我效能感对适度饮酒很重要,GSR和每日日记方法都有助于理解适度饮酒背景下变化的机制。每天写日记的方法可以提供显著的优势。讨论了未来研究的局限性和领域。
Despite ample research demonstrating the role of motivation and self-efficacy in predicting drinking in the context of abstinence, little research explicitly explores their role in the context of moderation, and none have utilized daily diary methods. The purpose of this study was to (a) explore the concordance between global self-report and daily diary composite measures of motivation and self-efficacy and (b) compare the ability of each in predicting drinking outcomes in the context of a study of brief AUD treatments focused on controlled drinking. Problem drinkers (N = 89) were assessed, provided feedback about their drinking, and randomly assigned to one of three conditions: two brief AUD treatments or a third group asked to change on their own. Global self-report (GSR) measures were administered at baseline and Week 8 (end of treatment). Daily diary composites (DDC) were created from data collected via an Interactive Voice Recording system during the week prior to baseline and the week prior to Week 8. Findings revealed some concordance between GSR and DDC at both baseline and Week 8, indicating the two methods capture some of the same construct; however, their respective relationships to drinking differed. DDC for both baseline and Week 8 significantly predicted Week 8 drinking outcomes, whereas only change in GSR significantly predicted drinking outcomes. Findings suggest that motivation and self-efficacy are important to moderated drinking, and that both GSR and daily diary methods are useful in understanding mechanisms of change in the context of moderation. Daily diary methods may provide significant advantages. Limitations and arenas for future research are discussed.