Architecture, Place and the ‘Care‐Full’ Design of Everyday Life
Architecture, Place and the ‘Care‐Full’ Design of Everyday Life
复制标题
建筑、场所与日常生活的“用心”设计
DOI：
10.1002/9781119053484.ch9
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Boys
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Boys
乔斯·博伊斯讨论了英国建筑教育中如何调动有关护理的假设，特别是如何通过场所营造的概念来体现这些假设。男孩对一本广泛使用的教科书提出了建设性的批评，该教科书概述了一种现象学方法，通过强调地方的情感、感官和物质品质来激发专业人士的关爱情感。博伊斯认为，这本书提出了一系列不可持续的想法，其中包括关于某些建筑形式和体验的普遍性的假设，这种假设忽视了身体的多样性和差异，以及建筑环境往往会造成严重的残疾这一事实。因此，男孩们利用当代社会理论和批判性设计来发展理解建筑教育中的关怀的替代方式，这些方式将注意力集中在设计的潜在排除上，并邀请专业人士积极认识和创造性地破坏当前实践中的正常化趋势。
Jos Boys discusses how assumptions about care are mobilised within architectural education in the UK, and particularly how these are refracted through the concept of place‐making. Boys offers a constructive criticism of a widely used textbook, which outlines a phenomenological approach to inspire caring sensibilities among professionals through stressing the emotional, sensory and material qualities of place. Boys argues that the book advances a series of unsustainable ideas, among them the assumption about the universality of certain built forms and experiences, which overlooks bodily diversity and difference as well as the fact that built environments can often be profoundly disabling. Boys therefore draws on contemporary social theory and critical design to develop alternative ways of understanding care in architectural education, ones that direct attention to the potential exclusions of design as well as invite professionals to actively recognise and creatively disrupt normalising tendencies in current practices.