Voice Under Scrutiny: Feminist Methods, Anticolonial Responses, and New Methodological Tools
Voice Under Scrutiny: Feminist Methods, Anticolonial Responses, and New Methodological Tools
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/00330124.2016.1208512
复制
发表时间：
2017-01-01
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Coddington, Kate
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Coddington, Kate
“让参与者发声”一直是地理领域定性女性主义研究项目的重要组成部分。在这篇文章中，我探讨了质疑定性研究对声音依赖的学术研究，认为声音、真实性和赋权之间的隐含联系正在开始被解开，尤其是从事反殖民工作的学者。我利用反殖民学术来建立和扩展以声音和参与为中心的女权主义辩论。女权主义者对声音的关注必须置于殖民框架和社会科学研究的历史中。专注于持续的定居者和殖民地关系的学术研究强调了在定性研究中谨慎进行和有意识地拒绝纳入声音的方法。我借鉴了反殖民的方法来框架研究决策，声音，及其使用的伦理和方法上的困境。
"Giving voice" to participants has been an important element of qualitative feminist research projects in geography. In this article, I explore scholarship that has questioned qualitative research's reliance on voice, arguing that implicit connections between voice, authenticity, and empowerment are beginning to be unpacked, particularly by scholars engaged in anticolonial work. I draw on anticolonial scholarship to build on and extend feminist debates centered on voice and participation. Feminist attention to voice must be situated within the colonial frameworks and histories of social science research. Scholarship focused on ongoing settler colonial relationships highlights methods both for cautiously proceeding with and consciously refusing incorporating voice within qualitative research. I draw on anticolonial approaches to frame research decisions, voice, and the ethical and methodological dilemmas of its use.