THE ELUSIVE RIGHT TO TRUTH IN TRANSITIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS JURISPRUDENCE
THE ELUSIVE RIGHT TO TRUTH IN TRANSITIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS JURISPRUDENCE
复制标题
过渡人权法学中难以捉摸的真相权
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
J. Sweeney
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Sweeney
摘要 本文对政治转型期后新兴法律义务的范围进行了比较法律分析，以找出历史上侵犯人权的真相。人权制度之间在过渡法理学中如何确立时效管辖权方面存在很大的不一致，这一点尚未得到系统的调查。本文通过确定和批评人权委员会的决定以及美洲人权法院和欧洲人权法院的区域判例中明示和暗示维护转型时期了解真相的权利的方式，填补了文献中的空白（结论还涉及篇幅较小的非洲区域判例）。有人认为，人权条约的“基本价值观”可以为强大但有限的了解真相的权利奠定基础。
Abstract This article undertakes a comparative legal analysis of the scope of an emerging legal duty to find the truth about historical human rights abuses after periods of political transition. There is substantial inconsistency between human rights regimes on how they establish temporal jurisdiction in their transitional jurisprudence, which has not yet been systematically investigated. This contribution fills the gap in the literature by identifying and critiquing the way in which the right to truth in times of transition is both expressly and implicitly vindicated in the decisions of the Human Rights Committee, and the regional jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and European Court of Human Rights (the conclusion also addresses the less voluminous African regional jurisprudence). It is argued that the ‘underlying values’ of human rights treaties can provide a foundation for a powerful but finite right to truth.