The neuronal nicotinic α4β2 receptor has a high maximal probability of being open
The neuronal nicotinic α4β2 receptor has a high maximal probability of being open
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00761.x
复制
发表时间:
2010-08-01
影响因子:
7.3
通讯作者:
Steinbach, Joe H.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Li, Ping;Steinbach, Joe H.
Background and purpose:A fundamental property of transmitter-gated ion channels is the probability a channel will be open (P(open)) when stimulated by a concentration of agonist that elicits a maximal response. This value is critical for interpreting steady-state concentration-response relationships in terms of channel activation, and for understanding the actions of drugs that potentiate responses. We used analysis of non-stationary noise to estimate the maximal probability the nicotinic alpha 4 beta 2 receptor is open.Experimental approach:HEK293 cells stably transfected to express human alpha 4 beta 2 nicotinic receptors were studied using whole-cell voltage clamp. Nicotinic agonists (acetylcholine, nicotine, cytisine and 5-iodo A-85380) were applied, and the relationship between variance of the elicited whole-cell current and mean current was analysed.Key results:The variance did not increase linearly with the mean current. For acetylcholine and nicotine the relationship between variance and mean indicates that the maximal P(open) is greater than 0.8. The number of agonist-activatable channels was estimated to be about 1000 per cell. The mean single channel conductance at -60 mV was indistinguishable when currents were elicited by acetylcholine (18 pS), nicotine (17 pS) or 5-iodo A-85380 (17 pS), whereas the value for cytisine was larger (24 pS).Conclusions and implications:The neuronal nicotinic alpha 4 beta 2 receptor has a maximal probability of being open that is greater than 0.8. This conclusion applies to the receptor containing three alpha 4 and two beta 2 subunits (the low-sensitivity stoichiometry), but may not apply to the receptor containing two alpha 4 and three beta 2 subunits (the high-sensitivity stoichiometry).This article is commented on by Papke, pp. 1903-1905 of this issue. To view this commentary visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00868.x.