Planning support tools and their effects in participatory urban adaptation workshops.

Planning support tools and their effects in participatory urban adaptation workshops.
复制标题

规划支持工具及其在参与式城市适应研讨会中的影响。

DOI:
10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.041
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
8.7
通讯作者:
J. Slinger
J. Slinger
中科院分区:
环境科学与生态学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. McEvoy;F. V. D. van de Ven;M. Blind;J. Slinger

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

面对不断变化的气候,许多城市都参与了适应规划,并利用参与式研讨会让利益相关者参与这些举措。不同的工具被用来构建参与式规划研讨会的流程和内容,但尚不清楚这些工具对研讨会及其结果有何影响。我们在重复的模拟研讨会中评估了三种不同的工具(小组模型构建、适应支持工具和压力测试指南)和无工具方法,以观察和比较(1)研讨会的开展方式,以及(2)所取得的直接成果。工具似乎对这两方面都有影响。具体来说,我们测量了小组学习效果、小组内共同理解的发展、小组制定的计划类型以及研讨会期间参与性质的差异。需要进一步的研究来将这些结果转化为实践,但这是推进有关参与式规划活动中工具影响的知识的第一步。
In the face of a changing climate, many cities are engaged in adaptation planning and are using participatory workshops to involve stakeholders in these initiatives. Different tools are being used to structure the process and content of participatory planning workshops, but it is unclear what effect the tools have on the workshops and their results. We evaluated three different tools (Group Model Building, the Adaptation Support Tool, and the Stress Test Guideline) and a tool-free approach in repeated simulated workshops, to observe and compare (1) the way workshops played out, and (2) the direct outcomes that were achieved. Tools appear to influence both aspects. Specifically, we measured differences in the learning effects in groups, in the development of shared understanding within groups, in the types of plans that are developed by groups, and in the nature of participation during the workshops. Further research is needed to translate these results into practice, but this is a first step in advancing knowledge about the influence of tools in participatory planning activities.