Logic model framework for considering the inputs, processes and outcomes of a healthcare organisation-research partnership.
Logic model framework for considering the inputs, processes and outcomes of a healthcare organisation-research partnership.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010059
复制
发表时间：
2020-09
影响因子：
5.4
通讯作者：
Elston Lafata J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tabriz AA;Flocke SA;Shires D;Dyer KE;Schreiber M;Elston Lafata J
已发表的文献对如何在交付系统科学的背景下实施或考虑知识合作生产伙伴关系的影响提供了很少的见解。描述卫生保健组织-大学研究伙伴关系是如何发展的，并用于设计、开发和实施一种实践综合决策支持工具，用于医生推荐的结直肠癌筛查患者。工具性案例研究。从项目文件记录和半结构化问卷中确定数据，这些问卷发送给16个卫生保健组织的领导和工作人员、研究调查员和研究工作人员。使用逻辑模型框架，我们组织了卫生保健组织-基于大学的研究伙伴关系的关键输入、过程和结果。除了务实的研究人员之外，伙伴关系的输入还包括一个具有支持性实践环境的医疗保健组织和一个执行级别的项目发起人，一个担任组织倡导者的中层管理人员，以及不断接触具有相关技术、政策和系统/流程知识的组织员工。在项目设计和实施过程中，伙伴关系过程包括利用项目团队会议、组织常设会议和一对一咨询为共享学习和解决问题提供平台。决策责任由卫生保健组织和研究团队共同承担。我们讨论了伙伴关系的短期成果，包括伙伴关系如何影响当前研究团队的知识和卫生系统倡议。使用逻辑模型框架，我们描述了如何实现医疗保健组织-基于大学的研究团队伙伴关系。其他对在交付系统科学项目的背景下发展、实施和评估知识合作生产伙伴关系感兴趣的人可以利用这些经验来考虑发展、实施和评估类似合作生产伙伴关系的方法。
The published literature provides few insights regarding how to implement or consider the effects of knowledge co-production partnerships in the context of delivery system science. To describe how a health care organization—university-based research partnership was developed and used to design, develop and implement a practice-integrated decision support tool for patients with a physician recommendation for colorectal cancer screening. Instrumental case study. Data were ascertained from project documentation records and semi-structured questionnaires sent to 16 health care organization leaders and staff, research investigators, and research staff members. Using a logic model framework, we organized the key inputs, processes and outcomes of a health care organization—university-based research partnership. In addition to pragmatic researchers, partnership inputs included a health care organization with a supportive practice environment and an executive-level project sponsor, a mid-level manager to serve as the organizational champion, and continual access to organizational employees with relevant technical, policy and system/process knowledge. During program design and implementation, partnership processes included using project team meetings, standing organizational meetings, and one-on-one consultancies to provide platforms for shared learning and problem solving. Decision-making responsibility was shared between the health care organization and research team. We discuss the short-term outcomes of the partnership, including how the partnership affected the current research team’s knowledge and health system initiatives. Using a logic model framework, we have described how a health care organization—university-based research team partnership was implemented. Others interested in developing, implementing, and evaluating knowledge co-production partnerships in the context of delivery system science projects can use the experiences to consider ways to develop, implement and evaluate similar co-production partnerships.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Cornwall, A;Jewkes, R
通讯作者：
Jewkes, R
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Graham, ID;Logan, J;Tugwell, P
通讯作者：
Tugwell, P
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Graham, Ian D.;Kothari, Anita;McCutcheon, Chris
通讯作者：
McCutcheon, Chris
影响因子：
4
作者：
Hoekstra, Femke;Ginis, Kathleen A. Martin;Gainforth, Heather L.
通讯作者：
Gainforth, Heather L.
案例研究方法。
影响因子：
4
作者：
Crowe S;Cresswell K;Robertson A;Huby G;Avery A;Sheikh A
通讯作者：
Sheikh A