Measuring cognitive vulnerability to depression: Further evidence on the factorial and predictive validity of negative cognitive style
Measuring cognitive vulnerability to depression: Further evidence on the factorial and predictive validity of negative cognitive style
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.04.005
复制
发表时间：
2019-12-01
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Caudek, Corrado
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Giuntoli, Laura;Marchetti, Igor;Caudek, Corrado
背景和目的：以往的研究对消极认知风格问卷的因素效度缺乏足够的证据，这对总分计算的效度是一个问题。在研究一中，我们着重探讨了内在性与消极认知风格其他维度之间的关系。研究二探讨了消极认知风格对消极解释偏差的预测效度。方法：研究一，770名被试完成了认知风格问卷（CSQ-SF）。在研究2中，我们从预筛选的数据收集（N = 300）中选择了对抑郁具有低（N = 40）和高（N = 32）认知脆弱性的参与者，这些参与者接受了负面情绪诱导并完成了生成性解释任务。在研究1中，验证性因素分析（CFA）表明，CSQ-SF的最佳拟合模型是一个双因素模型没有内在性的维度。在研究2中，CFA复制了研究1的析因结构，在控制抑郁症状后，具有高度消极认知风格的个体表现出消极的解释偏差。局限性：大学年龄段的样本限制了我们的结果对不同人群的普遍性，纵向数据的缺乏使我们无法进一步讨论消极解释偏见与消极解释偏见之间的关系。结论：总之，我们的两项研究的结果支持CSQ-SF的结构效度，并建议使用没有内在性的消极认知风格的综合评分。
Background and objectives: Previous research has provided insufficient evidence on the factorial validity of the negative cognitive style questionnaires, which is a problem for the validity of the total scores computation. In Study 1, we focused on the relationship between internality and the other dimensions of negative cognitive style. In Study 2, we explored the predictive validity of negative cognitive style for negative interpretation bias.Methods: In Study 1, 770 participants completed the Cognitive Style Questionnaire - Short Form (CSQ-SF). In Study 2, from a prescreening data collection (N = 300) we selected participants with low (N = 40) and high (N = 32) cognitive vulnerability to depression who were primed with negative mood induction and who completed a generative interpretation task.Results: In Study 1, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the best fitting model for the CSQ-SF was a bifactor model without the internality dimension. In Study 2, a CFA replicated the factorial structure of Study 1 and individuals with a high negative cognitive style exhibited a negative interpretation bias after controlling for depressive symptoms.Limitations: The university-age sample limited the generalizability of our results to different populations, and the lack of longitudinal data prevented us from discussing further implications on the relationship between the negative interpretation bias and negative cognitive style in predicting depression.Conclusions: Together, the results of our two studies support the construct validity of the CSQ-SF and recommend the use of a composite score of negative cognitive style without internality.