Quiet eye training improves surgical knot tying more than traditional technical training: a randomized controlled study

Quiet eye training improves surgical knot tying more than traditional technical training: a randomized controlled study
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.12.042
复制
发表时间:
2014-08-01
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Vickers, Joan N.
Vickers, Joan N.
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Causer, Joe;Harvey, Adrian;Vickers, Joan N.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景技术背景:我们研究的有效性技术培训(TT)和安静的眼睛训练(QE)的性能单手方结打结在surgical residents.METHODS:20名外科住院医师被随机分配到2组,并完成预测试,培训,保留,和转移测试。参与者戴着一个移动的眼动仪,可以同时记录他们的视线和手部动作。因变量为打结性能(%),QE持续时间(%),固定次数,总运动时间(s),和手运动相时间(s)。结果:QE训练组有显着更高的性能评分,更长的QE持续时间,更少的固定,更快的总打结时间,更快的运动相时间相比,TT组。QE组保持在传输测试中的性能,而TT组显着降低性能保留transfer.CONCLUSIONS:QE培训显着提高学习,保留和转让的外科打结相比,传统的技术方法。使用QE建模、指导和反馈,性能有效性(性能结果)和运动效率(手部运动时间)都得到了改善。(C)2014爱思唯尔公司All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: We examined the effectiveness of technical training (TT) and quiet eye training (QE) on the performance of one-handed square knot tying in surgical residents.METHODS: Twenty surgical residents were randomly assigned to the 2 groups and completed pretest, training, retention, and transfer tests. Participants wore a mobile eye tracker that simultaneously recorded their gaze and hand movements. Dependent variables were knot tying performance (%), QE duration (%), number of fixations, total movement time (s), and hand movement phase time (s).RESULTS: The QE training group had significantly higher performance scores, a longer QE duration, fewer fixations, faster total knot tying times, and faster movement phase times compared with the TT group. The QE group maintained performance in the transfer test, whereas the TT group significantly decreased performance from retention to transfer.CONCLUSIONS: QE training significantly improved learning, retention, and transfer of surgical knot tying compared with a traditional technical approach. Both performance effectiveness (performance outcome) and movement efficiency (hand movement times) were improved using QE modeling, instruction, and feedback. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.