Cross-Cultural Aspect of Behavior Assessment System for Children-2, Parent Rating Scale-Child: Standardization in Korean Children.

Cross-Cultural Aspect of Behavior Assessment System for Children-2, Parent Rating Scale-Child: Standardization in Korean Children.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3349/ymj.2017.58.2.439
复制
发表时间:
2017-03
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Kim YS
Kim YS
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Song J;Leventhal BL;Koh YJ;Cheon KA;Hong HJ;Kim YK;Cho K;Lim EC;Park JI;Kim YS

文献摘要

相似文献

本研究旨在检验韩国儿童行为评估系统-2,家长评定量表-儿童(BASC-2 PRS-C)的心理测量特性和跨文化效用。研究人员招募了两个研究人群:来自16所小学的一至六年级的普通人群样本(n=2115)和来自5个儿童精神病学诊所的6-12岁的临床人群(n=219),以及自闭症谱系障碍的流行病学样本。我们评估了韩国版BASC-2 PRS-C (K-BASC-2 PRS-C)的有效性和可靠性,并将其与美国人群使用的量表进行了比较。我们的研究结果表明,K-BASC-2 PRS-C是一种有价值的工具,具有与西方人群相当的信度和效度。然而,韩国和美国人在BASC-2 PRS-C的平均得分上存在一些差异。K-BASC-2 PRS-C是一种有效且有用的心理测量工具,可用于一般发展性精神病理的测量。观察到的韩美两国在父母对儿童行为的报告模式上的差异表明,对评估精神病理学的工具进行验证、标准化和文化适应的重要性,尤其是在不同于最初创建该工具的人群中使用时。
Our study aimed to examine psychometric properties and cross-cultural utility of the Behavior Assessment System for Children-2, Parent Rating Scale-Child (BASC-2 PRS-C) in Korean children. Two study populations were recruited: a general population sample (n=2115) of 1st to 6th graders from 16 elementary schools and a clinical population (n=219) of 6–12 years old from 5 child psychiatric clinics and an epidemiological sample of autism spectrum disorder. We assessed the validity and reliability of the Korean version of BASC-2 PRS-C (K-BASC-2 PRS-C) and compared subscales with those used for US populations. Our results indicate that the K-BASC-2 PRS-C is a valuable instrument with reliability and validity for measuring developmental psychopathology that is comparable to those in Western population. However, there were some differences noted in the mean scores of BASC-2 PRS-C between Korean and US populations. K-BASC-2 PRS-C is an effective and useful instrument with psychometric properties that permits measurement of general developmental psychopathology. Observed Korean-US differences in patterns of parental reports of children's behaviors indicate the importance of the validation, standardization and cultural adaptation for tools assessing psychopathology especially when used in populations different from those for which the instrument was originally created.