Duns Scotus on Formal Distinction
Duns Scotus on Formal Distinction
复制标题
邓斯·斯科特斯论形式区别
DOI：
10.11439/philosophy.2019.250
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
本間 裕之
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Karthikeyan Goutham;Shimada Toru;Goutham Karthikeyan;本間 裕之
几乎所有的解释者都同意，《司各脱》的形式区别（distinctio formalis）位于形式/实体/现实之间。这一概念的特点是，在没有智力的情况下存在的真实的区别（distinctio realis）和只由智力活动产生的理性区别（distinctio rationis）之间存在一种“中介区别”。根据司各脱的观点，形式上的区分既有真实的基础，又与理智有关。这些特征并没有提供一个完整的阐述正式的区别，而是，他们提出了问题的性质正式：什么是它的本体论地位，以及如何正式区别与智力。主要的口译员，如Maurice Gravenski，Allan Wolter和Michel Jordan，没有对这些问题提供明确的答案。
Almost all interpreters agree that the formal distinction (distinctio formalis) of Duns Scotus is located between formalities/entities/realities. This concept is characterized as a “mediate distinction” between the real distinction (distinctio realis), which exists without intellect, and the distinction of reason (distinctio rationis), which is produced only by the activity of the intellect. According to Scotus, the formal distinction has both a real basis and a relationship to intellect. These characterizations do not provide a complete exposition of formal distinction; rather, they raise questions about the nature of formality: what is its ontological status, and how formal distinction relates to intellect. Major interpreters, such as Maurice Grajewski, Allan Wolter, and Michel Jordan, have not provided clear answers to these questions.