Critical Language Awareness Part I: A Critical Review of Three Current Approaches to Language Awareness.
Critical Language Awareness Part I: A Critical Review of Three Current Approaches to Language Awareness.
复制标题
批判性语言意识第一部分：对当前三种语言意识方法的批判性回顾。
DOI：
10.1080/09500789009541291
复制
发表时间：
1990
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
M. Martin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Clark;N. Fairclough;R. Ivanič;M. Martin
抽象的。我们认为，培养对世界的批判意识应该是所有教育的主要目标，包括语言教育。因此，语言意识方案不仅应帮助儿童发展关于其世界的语言实践的操作性和描述性知识，而且还应帮助儿童批判性地认识到这些实践是如何被社会关系和权力关系塑造的，以及如何塑造这些关系和权力关系。在这篇由两部分组成的论文中，我们表明，一系列现有的语言意识建议和材料在这个意义上并不“关键”。相反，除了少数例外，他们把语言实践的自然化领域作为一个自然领域，一个给定的常识现实，其社会根源是看不到的。这是真正的双语，方言和diabeticic变异。目前大多数语言意识的研究方法都把语言实践领域看作是一个多元和谐的领域，没有注意到意识形态的差异。
Abstract. We assume that the development of a critical awareness of the world ought to be the main objective of all education, including language education. Language awareness programmes ought therefore to help children develop not only operational and descriptive knowledge of the linguistic practices of their world, but also a critical awareness of how these practices are shaped by, and shape, social relationships and relationships of power. In this, the first of a two‐part paper, we show that a range of existing language awareness proposals and materials are not ‘critical’ in this sense. On the contrary, with a few exceptions, they present the naturalised domain of linguistic practices as a natural domain, a given and common sense reality whose social origins are out of sight. This is true for bilingual, dialectal and diatypic variation. Most current approaches to language awareness present the domain of linguistic practices as a pluralistically harmonious domain; no attention is given to ideological di...