Comparison of mothers', fathers', and teachers' reports on problem behavior in 5-to 6-year-old children

Comparison of mothers', fathers', and teachers' reports on problem behavior in 5-to 6-year-old children
复制标题

DOI:
10.1023/b:joba.0000013661.14995.59
复制
发表时间:
2004-06-01
影响因子:
1.6
通讯作者:
Hellinckx, W
Hellinckx, W
中科院分区:
心理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Grietens, H;Onghena, P;Hellinckx, W

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

有证据表明,有低协议之间的多个线人报告儿童和青少年的行为问题。然而,很少有研究集中在特定年龄组的线人之间的协议。本研究通过分析2个非临床样本的5- 6岁学龄前儿童(N = 424)的CBCL和TRF数据,探讨了母亲,父亲和教师之间的问题行为报告的对应关系和分歧。调查结果表明,评分者间的一致性为低至中度。这是由相互关系,回归分析中的解释方差和所有3个线人评为行为困扰的儿童数量的重叠。母亲和父亲的报告之间的协议是最高的,而母亲和教师的报告之间的协议最低。受访者之间的分歧是最高的内化问题。对缺乏一致性的可能解释进行了讨论。制定指南以完善评估和优化临床决策过程。
Evidence exists that there is low agreement between multiple informants reporting on children's and adolescents' behavior problems. Few studies, however, focus on agreement between informants in specific age groups. This study examined correspondence and disagreement between mother, father, and teacher reports of problem behavior by analyzing CBCL and TRF data of 2 nonclinical samples of 5- to 6-year-old preschool children (N = 424). Findings indicated that interrater agreement was low to moderate. This was shown by the intercorrelations, the explained variance in regression analyses and the little overlap in the number of children rated as behaviorally disturbed by all 3 informants. Agreement between mother and father reports was highest, whereas agreement between mother and teacher reports was lowest. Disagreement between informants was highest for internalizing problems. Potential explanations for the lack of agreement are discussed. Guidelines are formulated to refine assessment and optimize clinical decision-making processes.