Flood resilience: a systematic review
Flood resilience: a systematic review
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/09640568.2019.1641474
复制
发表时间：
2019-08
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
K. McClymont;D. Morrison;L. Beevers;E. Carmen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. McClymont;D. Morrison;L. Beevers;E. Carmen
由于气候变化，水文灾害的频率正在增加，这激发了洪水风险管理（FRM）的文化变革。与气候变化相关的不确定性导致人们转向洪水复原力，因为它有助于应对影响极端流量的意外气候扰动。复原力的概念越来越受欢迎，产生了多种定义、测量和应用。本文系统地回顾了FRM文献，以澄清弹性的不同观点以及它们如何影响这一概念的成功实施。我们的分析评估了FRM在三个预先定义的跨学科的弹性理解中的定位。弹性的多义性质产生了许多不同的观点，阻碍了成功的操作。复原力是跨学科的;因此，它需要自上而下和自下而上的森林资源管理方法相结合，以及对时间和空间尺度之间的相互依存关系采取更全面的方法。
Hydro-hazards are increasing in frequency due to climate change which has inspired a cultural change in Flood Risk Management (FRM). Uncertainty associated with climate change has resulted in a shift towards flood resilience as it helps deal with unexpected climatic perturbations that impact extreme flows. The concept of resilience has increased in popularity, leading to a multitude of definitions, measurements and applications. This paper systematically reviews the FRM literature to provide clarity on the differing perspectives of resilience and how they influence successful implementation of the concept. Our analysis assesses where FRM is positioned within three pre-defined interdisciplinary understandings of resilience. The polysemic nature of resilience has produced a multitude of different perspectives that prevent successful operationalisation. Resilience is interdisciplinary; therefore it requires integration between top-down and bottom-up FRM approaches, as well as a more holistic approach to the interdependence between temporal and spatial scales.