A Comment on and Correction to: Opinion Dynamics in the Presence of Increasing Agreement Pressure
A Comment on and Correction to: Opinion Dynamics in the Presence of Increasing Agreement Pressure
复制标题
DOI：
10.1109/tcyb.2021.3087710
复制
发表时间：
2020-12
影响因子：
11.8
通讯作者：
Christopher Griffin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Christopher Griffin
我们确定了Semonsen等人（2018）中给出的共识结果的反例。我们解决了反例替换引理5在给定的参考与一个新的变化的Banach不动点定理，这既解释了数值结果的参考文献和反例（S）在本说明中，并提供了一个充分条件的共识系统与同行压力增加。这项工作是相关的其他文件，已使用的证明技术，从Semonsen等人。并建立了准确性，他们的索赔假设新的充分条件。
We identify counterexamples to the consensus result given in Semonsen et al. (2018). We resolve the counterexamples by replacing Lemma 5 in the given reference with a novel variation of the Banach fixed-point theorem, which explains both the numerical results in the reference and the counterexample(s) in this note and provides a sufficient condition for consensus in systems with increasing peer-pressure. This work is relevant for other papers that have used the proof technique from Semonsen et al. and establishes the veracity of their claims assuming the new sufficient condition.