A familiar-size Stroop effect: real-world size is an automatic property of object representation.
A familiar-size Stroop effect: real-world size is an automatic property of object representation.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/a0028294
复制
发表时间：
2012-06
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Oliva, Aude
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Konkle, Talia;Oliva, Aude
当我们认出一个物体时，我们是否会自动知道它在世界上有多大？我们采用了一个类似Stroop的范例，其中两个熟悉的物体以不同的视觉尺寸呈现在屏幕上。当物体的真实尺寸与视觉尺寸一致时，观察者能更快地指出屏幕上哪个更大或更小，而不是当物体的真实尺寸与视觉尺寸不一致时，这表明了熟悉的Stroop效应。重要的是，物体的真实大小与任务无关。这种Stroop效应也存在时，只有一个项目是目前在一个一致或不一致的视觉尺寸上显示。相比之下，对于那些仅仅学习了一条规则将新物体分类为大或小的参与者，没有观察到Stroop效应。这些结果表明，人们访问熟悉的大小的对象没有这样做的意图，表明现实世界的大小是一个自动属性的对象表示。
When we recognize an object, do we automatically know how big it is in the world? We employed a Stroop-like paradigm, in which two familiar objects were presented at different visual sizes on the screen. Observers were faster to indicate which was bigger or smaller on the screen when the real-world size of the objects was congruent with the visual size than when it was incongruent— demonstrating a familiar-size Stroop effect. Critically, the real-world size of the objects was irrelevant for the task. This Stroop effect was also present when only one item was present at a congruent or incongruent visual size on the display. In contrast, no Stroop effect was observed for participants who simply learned a rule to categorize novel objects as big or small. These results show that people access the familiar size of objects without the intention of doing so, demonstrating that real-world size is an automatic property of object representation.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1037/a0020413
发表时间：
2011-02
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Konkle, Talia;Oliva, Aude
通讯作者：
Oliva, Aude
影响因子：
--
作者：
Pelli, DG
通讯作者：
Pelli, DG
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Mack, Michael L.;Gauthier, Isabel;Palmeri, Thomas J.
通讯作者：
Palmeri, Thomas J.
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
KOSSLYN, SM
通讯作者：
KOSSLYN, SM
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
Sperandio, Irene;Savazzi, Silvia;Marzi, Carlo A.
通讯作者：
Marzi, Carlo A.